These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Quality of stone dies produced by different impression materials. A comparative study of impression techniques. Wiktorsson G; Feder D Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 6348989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Influences of hardness of heavy-body-type silicone impression materials on dimensional accuracy of stone dies]. Nakamura Y Tsurumi Shigaku; 1986 Sep; 12(3):343-66. PubMed ID: 3333101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional measurement of stone cast deformation. Part 2. Effects of types of impression material and mold on the dimensional stability of stone casts. Habu H; Kobayashi K J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1986 Mar; 28(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 3519890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Technical development of a silicone impression method. Application of copper-bonded individualized trays]. Takesue H Shikai Tenbo; 1984 Jul; 64(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 6390749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Dimensional changes of stone models made by the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials (author's transl)]. Kurosaki N; Takatsu T; Kezuka K; Kuroiwa S; Yokoyama H Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 31(2):21-6. PubMed ID: 4620679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Dimensional characteristics in various impression methods with viscoelastic materials for inlays, crowns and bridges]. Dumfahrt H; Schäffer H Z Stomatol; 1987 Sep; 84(5):231-9. PubMed ID: 3328940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of cervical discrepancy of gold crowns in stone dies from various impression materials]. Mantovani AV; Stephano CB; Roselino RF; Roselino RB; Campos GM Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 2135328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Changes in the shape and dimensions of stone dies in relation to various materials and methods of preparation]. Sandig C Protet Stomatol; 1981; 31(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 7036222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Profilometric research on silicone impression materials]. Nechaenko NA; Urusov NV; Kazakov VA; Rappoport RM; Tagiev AI Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1989; 68(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 2665192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linear dimensional changes in elastic impression materials. Marcinak CF; Young FA; Draughn RA; Flemming WR J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(7):1152-5. PubMed ID: 6929810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of silver-plated and stone dies from rubber-base impressions. Cooney JP J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Sep; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 4612140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of stone-casts produced from selected addition-type silicone impressions. Finger W; Ohsawa M Scand J Dent Res; 1983 Feb; 91(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 6573762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]