These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30791832)

  • 1. Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Potts WB; Ramanna L; Perry T; Long CJ
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519831492. PubMed ID: 30791832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Head Shadow, Summation, and Squelch in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users With Linked Automatic Gain Controls.
    Bakal TA; Milvae KD; Chen C; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211018147. PubMed ID: 34057387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Synchronized Automatic Gain Control in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients Yields Significant Benefit in Static and Dynamic Listening Conditions.
    Dwyer RT; Chen C; Hehrmann P; Dwyer NC; Gifford RH
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014139. PubMed ID: 34027718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Bilateral Automatic Gain Control Synchronization in Cochlear Implants With and Without Head Movements: Sound Source Localization in the Frontal Hemifield.
    Pastore MT; Pulling KR; Chen C; Yost WA; Dorman MF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 64(7):2811-2824. PubMed ID: 34100627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
    Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.
    Spencer NJ; Tillery KH; Brown CA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):710-724. PubMed ID: 30204615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Everyday Listening Performance of Children Before and After Receiving a Second Cochlear Implant: Results Using the Parent Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
    Galvin KL; Mok M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 26418045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further simulations of the effect of cochlear-implant pre-processing and head movement on interaural level differences.
    Archer-Boyd AW; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jul; 150(1):506. PubMed ID: 34340491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
    Dorbeau C; Galvin J; Fu QJ; Legris E; Marx M; Bakhos D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of (Mis)Matched Compression Speed on Speech Recognition in Bimodal Listeners.
    Spirrov D; Kludt E; Verschueren E; Büchner A; Francart T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520948974. PubMed ID: 32865486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.
    Vincent C; Bébéar JP; Radafy E; Vaneecloo FM; Ruzza I; Lautissier S; Bordure P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 22436413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants.
    Loiselle LH; Dorman MF; Yost WA; Cook SJ; Gifford RH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 59(4):810-8. PubMed ID: 27411035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
    Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e22-e38. PubMed ID: 27579987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.