192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30792525)
1. An innovative visual acuity chart for urgent and primary care settings: validation of the Runge near vision card.
Cooke MD; Winter PA; McKenney KC; Packard KL; Williams V; Dorsey EA; Szabo A; Visotcky A; Warren CC; Wirostko WJ; Weinberg DV; Kim JE; Han DP
Eye (Lond); 2019 Jul; 33(7):1104-1110. PubMed ID: 30792525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork.
Bastawrous A; Rono HK; Livingstone IA; Weiss HA; Jordan S; Kuper H; Burton MJ
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 133(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 26022921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis).
Kaiser PK
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2009 Dec; 107():311-24. PubMed ID: 20126505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of an automated-ETDRS near and intermediate visual acuity measurement.
Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):663-667. PubMed ID: 31822041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The development of a "reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice.
Rosser DA; Laidlaw DA; Murdoch IE
Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 85(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 11264133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. REPRODUCIBILITY AND COMPARISON OF VISUAL ACUITY OBTAINED WITH SIGHTBOOK MOBILE APPLICATION TO NEAR CARD AND SNELLEN CHART.
Phung L; Gregori NZ; Ortiz A; Shi W; Schiffman JC
Retina; 2016 May; 36(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 26509223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of visual acuity in macular degeneration patients measured with snellen and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts.
Falkenstein IA; Cochran DE; Azen SP; Dustin L; Tammewar AM; Kozak I; Freeman WR
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):319-23. PubMed ID: 17706288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual Acuity Variability: Comparing Discrepancies between Snellen and ETDRS Measurements among Subjects Entering Prospective Trials.
Yu HJ; Kaiser PK; Zamora D; Bocanegra M; Cone C; Brown DM; Sadda SR; Wykoff CC
Ophthalmol Retina; 2021 Mar; 5(3):224-233. PubMed ID: 32595096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF VISUAL ACUITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN STANDARD EARLY TREATMENT DIABETIC RETINOPATHY STUDY CHART AND A HANDHELD EQUIVALENT IN EYES WITH RETINAL PATHOLOGY.
Rahimy E; Reddy S; DeCroos FC; Khan MA; Boyer DS; Gupta OP; Regillo CD; Haller JA
Retina; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1680-7. PubMed ID: 25719987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: performance of the "compact reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart in amblyopic children.
Laidlaw DA; Abbott A; Rosser DA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 87(10):1232-4. PubMed ID: 14507755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
Veselý P; Synek S
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Visual Acuity Measurement Using Three Methods: Standard ETDRS Chart, Near Chart and a Smartphone-Based Eye Chart Application.
Tiraset N; Poonyathalang A; Padungkiatsagul T; Deeyai M; Vichitkunakorn P; Vanikieti K
Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():859-869. PubMed ID: 33664563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability and Agreement of Visual Acuity Using the ETDRS Number Chart, Landolt C Chart, or ETDRS Alphabet Chart in Eyes With or Without Sight-Threatening Diseases.
Chaikitmongkol V; Nanegrungsunk O; Patikulsila D; Ruamviboonsuk P; Bressler NM
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 136(3):286-290. PubMed ID: 29346499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.
Beck RW; Moke PS; Turpin AH; Ferris FL; SanGiovanni JP; Johnson CA; Birch EE; Chandler DL; Cox TA; Blair RC; Kraker RT
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 12566024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
Hardgrave N; Hatley J; Lewerenz D
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Rashid S; Hysi P
Eye (Lond); 2012 Apr; 26(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 22193878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of applicability of different visual acuity charts for pediatric outpatient visual tests.
Fang H; Diao H; Chen L; Zeng J
Eye Sci; 2014 Jun; 29(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 26011958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel method for analyzing snellen visual acuity measurements.
Gregori NZ; Feuer W; Rosenfeld PJ
Retina; 2010; 30(7):1046-50. PubMed ID: 20559157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
