These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Impact of regadenoson-induced myocardial creep on dynamic Rubidium-82 PET myocardial blood flow quantification. Koenders SS; van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Ottervanger JP; Slump CH; van Dalen JA J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):719-728. PubMed ID: 30788758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute left ventricular dys-synchrony during regadenason PET myocardial perfusion stress test. Kerrigan J; Shivapour D; Tuzcu EM; Sabik EM; Jaber WA J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 22(2):388-90. PubMed ID: 25367451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The relationship between ischemia-induced left ventricular dysfunction, coronary flow reserve, and coronary steal on regadenoson stress-gated (82)Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging. Van Tosh A; Votaw JR; Reichek N; Palestro CJ; Nichols KJ J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1060-8. PubMed ID: 24092270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regadenoson pharmacologic rubidium-82 PET: a comparison of quantitative perfusion and function to dipyridamole. Cullom SJ; Case JA; Courter SA; McGhie AI; Bateman TM J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Feb; 20(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 23188625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship of Van Tosh A; Votaw JR; David Cooke C; Cao JJ; Palestro CJ; Nichols KJ J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Apr; 27(2):575-588. PubMed ID: 29946825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of obstructive coronary artery disease using regadenoson stress and 82Rb PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Hsiao E; Ali B; Blankstein R; Skali H; Ali T; Bruyere J; Kwong RY; Di Carli MF; Dorbala S J Nucl Med; 2013 Oct; 54(10):1748-54. PubMed ID: 23940305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Outflow Tract Contributions to 82Rb-PET Global Myocardial Blood Flow Computations. Van Tosh A; Reichek N; Palestro CJ; Nichols KJ J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Jun; 44(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26966126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the myocardial blood flow response to regadenoson and dipyridamole: a quantitative analysis in patients referred for clinical 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET. Goudarzi B; Fukushima K; Bravo P; Merrill J; Bengel FM Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Oct; 38(10):1908-16. PubMed ID: 21656246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are Patients With End-Stage Liver Disease Maximally Vasodilated?: Insights From Rubidium-82 PET Dilatory Perfusion. Aljizeeri A; Alali Alfaris M; Ahmed D; Farea J; Elneama A; Suliman I; Alharthi M; Ahmed A; Alsaileek A; Al-Mallah M JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 12(12):2583-2584. PubMed ID: 31542532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective. Moody JB; Lee BC; Corbett JR; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 22(5):935-51. PubMed ID: 25868451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Myocardial Creep: we can now look it in the eye without framewise PET-CT registration for myocardial blood flow quantification. von Felten E; Giannopoulos AA J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):747-748. PubMed ID: 30919270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of pharmacological stress agent on patient motion during rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion PET/CT. Memmott MJ; Tonge CM; Saint KJ; Arumugam P J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1286-1295. PubMed ID: 28054183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Correlation between coronary flow and myocardial fixation of rubidium-86 in dogs]. SERVADIO L; BARTOLOMEI G; COLIZZI C; GIORDANI R; DONATO L Minerva Cardioangiol; 1961 Dec; 9():758-61. PubMed ID: 13910918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated dynamic motion correction using normalized gradient fields for Lee BC; Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Melvin AC; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Murthy VL; Ficaro EP J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1982-1998. PubMed ID: 30406609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No need for frame-wise attenuation correction in dynamic Rubidium-82 PET for myocardial blood flow quantification. van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Ottervanger JP; Slump CH; van Dalen JA J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):738-745. PubMed ID: 30790203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incremental diagnostic value of regional myocardial blood flow quantification over relative perfusion imaging with generator-produced rubidium-82 PET. Yoshinaga K; Katoh C; Manabe O; Klein R; Naya M; Sakakibara M; Yamada S; Dekemp RA; Tsutsui H; Tamaki N Circ J; 2011; 75(11):2628-34. PubMed ID: 21873801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Brophey MD; Farukhi IM; Castanon R; DeLaPena R; Bradshaw L; Banerjee S J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Jun; 45(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 28408703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How to detect and correct myocardial creep in myocardial perfusion imaging using Rubidium-82 PET? Koenders SS; van Dijk JD; Jager PL; Ottervanger JP; Slump CH; van Dalen JA J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):729-734. PubMed ID: 30788759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Myocardial perfusion of infarcted and normal myocardium in propofol-anesthetized minipigs using (82)Rubidium PET. Rasmussen T; Follin B; Kastrup J; Christensen TE; Hammelev KP; Kjær A; Hasbak P J Nucl Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 23(3):599-603. PubMed ID: 26931633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]