These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30793611)

  • 1. Inconsistencies in institutional review board decisions: A proposal to regulate the decision-making process.
    Ekmekci PE; Guner MD
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2019; 120(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 30793611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inconsistency and institutional review boards.
    Goldman J; Katz MD
    JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 7045428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harmonization and streamlining of research oversight for pragmatic clinical trials.
    O'Rourke PP; Carrithers J; Patrick-Lake B; Rice TW; Corsmo J; Hart R; Drezner MK; Lantos JD
    Clin Trials; 2015 Oct; 12(5):449-56. PubMed ID: 26374678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance.
    Vardeny O; Hernandez AF; Cohen LW; Franklin A; Baqai M; Palmer S; Bierer BE; Cobb N
    Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 30866676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients come from populations and populations contain patients. A two-stage scientific and ethics review: The next adaptation for single institutional review boards.
    Knopman D; Alford E; Tate K; Long M; Khachaturian AS
    Alzheimers Dement; 2017 Aug; 13(8):940-946. PubMed ID: 28709585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do IRB members make decisions? A review and research agenda.
    Pritchard IA
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Jun; 6(2):31-46. PubMed ID: 21680975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Problems with Institutional Review Board inconsistency.
    Veatch RM
    JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 7045427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review of national research ethics regulations and guidelines in Middle Eastern Arab countries.
    Alahmad G; Al-Jumah M; Dierickx K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2012 Dec; 13():34. PubMed ID: 23234422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Administrative and research policies required to bring cellular therapies from the research laboratory to the patient's bedside.
    Yim R
    Transfusion; 2005 Oct; 45(4 Suppl):144S-58S. PubMed ID: 16181400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
    Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results.
    Amdur RJ; Biddle C
    JAMA; 1997 Mar; 277(11):909-14. PubMed ID: 9062330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: where should we go from here?
    De Vries R; DeBruin DA; Goodgame A
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 16625729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should the Decisions of Institutional Review Boards Be Consistent?
    Friesen P; Yusof ANM; Sheehan M
    Ethics Hum Res; 2019 Jul; 41(4):2-14. PubMed ID: 31336039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical Issues and Practical Challenges in Suicide Research.
    Hom MA; Podlogar MC; Stanley IH; Joiner TE
    Crisis; 2017 Mar; 38(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 27561221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Council for International Organizations and Medical Sciences (CIOMS) guidelines on ethics of clinical trials.
    Macrae DJ
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2007 May; 4(2):176-8, discussion 178-9. PubMed ID: 17494727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.