These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30793762)

  • 1. Vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy: Do perioperative outcomes differ? A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Rademaker D; Einarsson JI; Huirne JAF; Gu X; Cohen SL
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1040-1045. PubMed ID: 30793762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications in women aged 65 years or older: propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Lazzarini C; Ghezzi F
    Menopause; 2015 Jan; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 24977457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic and vaginal approaches to hysterectomy in the obese.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Serati M; Di Naro E; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Uccella S; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Marconi N; Ghezzi F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():85-90. PubMed ID: 25898369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?
    Beck TL; Morse CB; Gray HJ; Goff BA; Urban RR; Liao JB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):348.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26470825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In-hospital complications of vaginal versus laparoscopic-assisted benign hysterectomy among older women: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Lai JC; Chen HH; Huang SM; Wang KL; Huang N; Hu HY; Chou YJ
    Menopause; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27465711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.
    Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of obesity on vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy outcomes: A randomised control trial.
    Locher JA; Chrysostomou M; Djokovic D; Libhaber E; van Herendael BJ; Chrysostomou A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Aug; 287():227-231. PubMed ID: 37390756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial.
    Allam IS; Makled AK; Gomaa IA; El Bishry GM; Bayoumy HA; Ali DF
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1341-5. PubMed ID: 25524534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in Vaginal Hysterectomy Rates in an Integrated Healthcare System.
    Zaritsky E; Tucker LS; Kandahari N; Ojo A; Ritterman Weintraub M; Raine-Bennett TR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 29(4):489-498. PubMed ID: 34808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Women with Giant Uteri (≥1500 g): Feasibility and Outcomes.
    Uccella S; Casarin J; Marconi N; Cromi A; Morosi C; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 27223048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
    Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee SH; Oh SR; Cho YJ; Han M; Park JW; Kim SJ; Yun JH; Choe SY; Choi JS; Bae JW
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):83. PubMed ID: 31234852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Luchristt D; Kenton K; Bretschneider CE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3005-3011. PubMed ID: 35020034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of Race/Ethnicity with Surgical Route and Perioperative Outcomes of Hysterectomy for Leiomyomas.
    Ko JS; Suh CH; Huang H; Zhuo H; Harmanli O; Zhang Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 28(7):1403-1410.e2. PubMed ID: 33242598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology.
    Candiani M; Izzo S; Bulfoni A; Riparini J; Ronzoni S; Marconi A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 200(4):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19136094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hysterectomy in patients with previous cesarean section: comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal approaches.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Serati M; Di Naro E; Casarin J; Marconi N; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jan; 184():53-7. PubMed ID: 25463636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].
    Kovachev S; Ganovska A; Stankova T
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 1 Pt 1():4-10. PubMed ID: 27514161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in operative time and outcomes in minimally invasive hysterectomy from 2008 to 2018.
    Luchristt D; Brown O; Kenton K; Bretschneider CE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):202.e1-202.e12. PubMed ID: 32791126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.