These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30793768)

  • 1. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adapting cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing item selection rules to traditional item response theory.
    Sorrel MA; Barrada JR; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227196. PubMed ID: 31923227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Kaplan M; de la Torre J; Barrada JR
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 May; 39(3):167-188. PubMed ID: 29881001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-Objective Item Selection Methods in Computerized Adaptive Test Using the Higher-Order Cognitive Diagnostic Models.
    Xi C; Tu D; Cai Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jul; 46(5):422-438. PubMed ID: 35812813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Yang J; Chang HH; Tao J; Shi N
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jul; 44(5):346-361. PubMed ID: 32879535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data.
    Yigit HD; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jul; 43(5):388-401. PubMed ID: 31235984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining CAT with cognitive diagnosis: a weighted item selection approach.
    Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas J
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 21853408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing.
    Han KCT
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():7. PubMed ID: 29575849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Item Calibration Error on Variable-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Sun X; Liu Y; Xin T; Song N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():575141. PubMed ID: 33343450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-Efficiency Response Distribution-Based Item Selection Algorithms for Short-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Zheng C; Chang HH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Nov; 40(8):608-624. PubMed ID: 29881073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using a Response Time-Based Expected A Posteriori Estimator to Control for Differential Speededness in Computerized Adaptive Test.
    Kern JL; Choe E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jul; 45(5):361-385. PubMed ID: 34565941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing new online calibration methods for multidimensional computerized adaptive testing.
    Chen P; Wang C; Xin T; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 28130937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variable-Length Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Wang C; Weiss DJ; Shang Z
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):749-771. PubMed ID: 30511327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attribute Discrimination Index-Based Method to Balance Attribute Coverage for Short-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Wang Y; Sun X; Chong W; Xin T
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():224. PubMed ID: 32180747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Sequential Process Model for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment With Repeated Attempts.
    Hung SP; Huang HY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):495-511. PubMed ID: 31534286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Xu G; Wang C; Shang Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 27435032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.