These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30793768)

  • 21. Conducting simulation studies for computerized adaptive testing using SimulCAT: an instructional piece.
    Han KCT
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():20. PubMed ID: 30114899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nonparametric CAT for CD in Educational Settings With Small Samples.
    Chang YP; Chiu CY; Tsai RC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):543-561. PubMed ID: 31534289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment.
    McGlohen M; Chang HH
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Aug; 40(3):808-21. PubMed ID: 18697677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A general proof of consistency of heuristic classification for cognitive diagnosis models.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):387-409. PubMed ID: 25872467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Sequential Process Model for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment With Repeated Attempts.
    Hung SP; Huang HY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):495-511. PubMed ID: 31534286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Overview and current management of computerized adaptive testing in licensing/certification examinations.
    Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():17. PubMed ID: 28811394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Blocked-CAT Procedure for CD-CAT.
    Kaplan M; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jan; 44(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 31853158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing the Misclassification Costs of Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing: Item Selection With Minimum Expected Risk.
    Hsu CL; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 May; 46(3):185-199. PubMed ID: 35528270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing Item-Level Fit for the DINA Model.
    Wang C; Shu Z; Shang Z; Xu G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 39(7):525-538. PubMed ID: 29881024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methods for online calibration of Q-matrix and item parameters for polytomous responses in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Tan Q; Wang D; Luo F; Cai Y; Tu D
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38689154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Post-hoc simulation study of computerized adaptive testing for the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Choi J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():14. PubMed ID: 29770677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Termination Rules for Variable-Length CD-CAT From the Information Theory Perspective.
    Guo L; Zheng C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1122. PubMed ID: 31191385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.
    Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas JA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):144-68. PubMed ID: 22506914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cognitive Diagnosis for Small Educational Programs: The General Nonparametric Classification Method.
    Chiu CY; Sun Y; Bian Y
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; 83(2):355-375. PubMed ID: 29150816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Novel item selection strategies for cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing: A heuristic search framework.
    Cao X; Lin Y; Liu D; Zheng F; Duh HB
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):2859-2885. PubMed ID: 37749422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An Adaptive Design for Item Parameter Online Estimation and Q-Matrix Online Calibration in CD-CAT.
    Wang W; Tu Y; Song L; Zheng J; Wang T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():710497. PubMed ID: 34504460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cognitive diagnostic assessment with different weight for attribute: based on the Dina model.
    Guo L; Bao Y; Wang Z; Bian Y
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Jun; 114(3):802-22. PubMed ID: 25074303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An iterative two-step method for online item calibration in CD-CAT.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Jan; 56(1):233-257. PubMed ID: 36581783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 25943366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficient Models for Cognitive Diagnosis With Continuous and Mixed-Type Latent Variables.
    Hong H; Wang C; Lim YS; Douglas J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jan; 39(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 29880992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.