These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30793768)

  • 41. Efficient Models for Cognitive Diagnosis With Continuous and Mixed-Type Latent Variables.
    Hong H; Wang C; Lim YS; Douglas J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jan; 39(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 29880992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations.
    Leung CK; Chang HH; Hau KT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):239-57. PubMed ID: 16293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Utilizing Response Times in Computerized Classification Testing.
    Sie H; Finkelman MD; Riley B; Smits N
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jul; 39(5):389-405. PubMed ID: 29881015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Non-Compensatory Item Response Theory Models.
    Hsu CL; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Sep; 43(6):464-480. PubMed ID: 31452555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Advances in CD-CAT: The General Nonparametric Item Selection Method.
    Chiu CY; Chang YP
    Psychometrika; 2021 Dec; 86(4):1039-1057. PubMed ID: 34341914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: The Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model and the General Diagnostic Model.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):585-610. PubMed ID: 27230079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. On Interim Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing in Learning Context.
    Wang C
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jun; 45(4):235-252. PubMed ID: 34176998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparing single-pool and multiple-pool designs regarding test security in computerized testing.
    Zhang J; Chang HH; Yi Q
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 22218817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.
    Halkitis PN
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment.
    Kreiter CD; Ferguson K; Gruppen LD
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10):1125-8. PubMed ID: 10536635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.
    da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Asymptotic Distribution of Average Test Overlap Rate in Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Choe EM; Chang HH
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1129-1151. PubMed ID: 31264029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Item Selection Criteria With Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Lin CJ; Chang HH
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Apr; 79(2):335-357. PubMed ID: 30911196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A mixture model for responses and response times with a higher-order ability structure to detect rapid guessing behaviour.
    Lu J; Wang C; Zhang J; Tao J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):261-288. PubMed ID: 31385609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Introduction to the LIVECAT web-based computerized adaptive testing platform.
    Seo DG; Choi J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():27. PubMed ID: 33401349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Application of optimal designs to item calibration.
    Lu HY
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106747. PubMed ID: 25188318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The impacts of computer adaptive testing from a variety of perspectives.
    Kimura T
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():12. PubMed ID: 28552899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model.
    Wang Q; Zheng Y; Liu K; Cai Y; Peng S; Tu D
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):600-614. PubMed ID: 36750522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A New Method to Balance Measurement Accuracy and Attribute Coverage in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Sun X; Andersson B; Xin T
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 45(7-8):463-476. PubMed ID: 34866707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.