These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3079471)

  • 1. Evaluation of simplified and commercial systems for identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Deák T; Beuchat LR
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 7(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 3079471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the SIM, API 20C, and ID 32C Systems for Identification of Yeasts Isolated from Fruit Juice Concentrates and Beverages.
    Deak T; Beuchat LR
    J Food Prot; 1993 Jul; 56(7):585-592. PubMed ID: 31113036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study on the identification of food-borne yeasts.
    Török T; King AD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1991 Apr; 57(4):1207-12. PubMed ID: 2059042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pasteur yeasts system, a test-kit for yeasts identification. Its evaluation in comparison with three commercial methods and conventional procedures.
    Riviera L; Bellotti MG
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1988; 67(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 3242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Identification of yeast-like fungi: evaluation of 4 commercial systems].
    Russolo S; Sala A; Crotti D
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Dec; 20(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 6399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the API ATB 32C system for the rapid identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Rohm H; Lechner F; Lehner M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1990 Dec; 11(3-4):215-23. PubMed ID: 2282283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the MicroScan enzyme-based system for the identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Deak T; Beuchat LR
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1995 Oct; 79(4):439-46. PubMed ID: 7592137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative performance of Fungichrom I, Candifast and API 20C Aux systems in the identification of clinically significant yeasts.
    Gündeş SG; Gulenc S; Bingol R
    J Med Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 50(12):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 11761197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of the Iatron serological Candida check kit and the API 20C kit for identification of medically important Candida species.
    Shinoda T; Kaufman L; Padhye AA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 7016900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates.
    Gutierrez J; Martin E; Lozano C; Coronilla J; Nogales C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994; 52(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 7856946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Pfaller MA; Preston T; Bale M; Koontz FP; Body BA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):2054-8. PubMed ID: 3182994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Kiehn TE; Edwards FF; Tom D; Lieberman G; Bernard EM; Armstrong D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 3897264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of YeastIdent and Uni-Yeast-Tek yeast identification systems.
    Salkin IF; Land GA; Hurd NJ; Goldson PR; McGinnis MR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Apr; 25(4):624-7. PubMed ID: 3571470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations of the current microbial identification system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1197-200. PubMed ID: 9574676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a multitest microtechnique for yeast identification.
    Miller RE; Lu LP
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Jul; 42(7):238-42. PubMed ID: 945942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the API 20C for identification of yeasts.
    Zwadyk P; Tarlton RA; Proctor A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1977 Mar; 67(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 842501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.
    Ramani R; Gromadzki S; Pincus DH; Salkin IF; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3396-8. PubMed ID: 9774605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
    Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.