145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30794978)
1. The Predictive Role of Intraoperative Visual Evoked Potentials in Visual Improvement After Endoscopic Pituitary Tumor Resection in Large and Complex Tumors: Description and Validation of a Method.
Feng R; Schwartz J; Loewenstern J; Kohli K; Lenina S; Ultakan S; Iloreta AM; Govindaraj S; Bederson J; Banik R; Shrivastava R
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e136-e143. PubMed ID: 30794978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative monitoring with visual evoked potentials for brain surgeries.
Gutzwiller EM; Cabrilo I; Radovanovic I; Schaller K; Boëx C
J Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 130(2):654-660. PubMed ID: 29600911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of intraoperative visual evoked potential amplitude reduction in predicting visual outcome after extended endoscopic endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas.
Tao X; Fan X; Gui S; Liu J; Yang X; Li K; Yang J; Li C; Qiao H
J Neurosurg; 2024 May; 140(5):1270-1275. PubMed ID: 37948695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potential: introduction of a clinically useful method.
Sasaki T; Itakura T; Suzuki K; Kasuya H; Munakata R; Muramatsu H; Ichikawa T; Sato T; Endo Y; Sakuma J; Matsumoto M
J Neurosurg; 2010 Feb; 112(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 19199497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials in transsphenoidal surgery.
Kamio Y; Sakai N; Sameshima T; Takahashi G; Koizumi S; Sugiyama K; Namba H
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2014; 54(8):606-11. PubMed ID: 25070017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elaborate mapping of the posterior visual pathway in awake craniotomy.
Shahar T; Korn A; Barkay G; Biron T; Hadanny A; Gazit T; Nossek E; Ekstein M; Kesler A; Ram Z
J Neurosurg; 2018 May; 128(5):1503-1511. PubMed ID: 28841121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are flash-evoked visual potentials useful for intraoperative monitoring of visual pathway function?
Cedzich C; Schramm J; Fahlbusch R
Neurosurgery; 1987 Nov; 21(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 3696406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Intraoperative monitoring: visual evoked potentials in surgery of the sellar region].
Lorenz M; Renella RR
Zentralbl Neurochir; 1989; 50(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2816163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Outcomes After Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Large and Giant Pituitary Macroadenoma: A Retrospective Review of 39 Consecutive Patients.
Chabot JD; Chakraborty S; Imbarrato G; Dehdashti AR
World Neurosurg; 2015 Oct; 84(4):978-88. PubMed ID: 26074433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical utility and limitations of intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials.
Luo Y; Regli L; Bozinov O; Sarnthein J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120525. PubMed ID: 25803287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation of the causes of instability of flash visual evoked potentials in intraoperative monitoring and proposal of a recording method for reliable functional monitoring of visual evoked potentials using a light-emitting device.
Sato A
J Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 125(4):888-897. PubMed ID: 26894463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngioma: the importance of the relationship between pituitary stalk and tumor.
Dho YS; Kim YH; Se YB; Han DH; Kim JH; Park CK; Wang KC; Kim DG
J Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 129(3):611-619. PubMed ID: 28960155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative monitoring of cortically recorded visual response for posterior visual pathway.
Ota T; Kawai K; Kamada K; Kin T; Saito N
J Neurosurg; 2010 Feb; 112(2):285-94. PubMed ID: 19630493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standard and limitation of intraoperative monitoring of the visual evoked potential.
Kodama K; Goto T; Sato A; Sakai K; Tanaka Y; Hongo K
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Apr; 152(4):643-8. PubMed ID: 20127123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and early prognosis for vision after transsphenoidal surgery for sellar lesions.
Berkmann S; Fandino J; Zosso S; Killer HE; Remonda L; Landolt H
J Neurosurg; 2011 Sep; 115(3):518-27. PubMed ID: 21639700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative visual evoked potential has no association with postoperative visual outcomes in transsphenoidal surgery.
Chung SB; Park CW; Seo DW; Kong DS; Park SK
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Aug; 154(8):1505-10. PubMed ID: 22739773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A significant increase in intraoperative flash visual evoked potential amplitude during craniopharyngioma surgery-case report].
Kawaguchi T; Ogawa Y; Fujiwara S; Tominaga T
No Shinkei Geka; 2015 Apr; 43(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 25838303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extent of Resection, Visual, and Endocrinologic Outcomes for Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Recurrent Pituitary Adenomas.
Do H; Kshettry VR; Siu A; Belinsky I; Farrell CJ; Nyquist G; Rosen M; Evans JJ
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jun; 102():35-41. PubMed ID: 28286277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spinal cord hemangioblastomas: significance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for resection and long-term outcome.
Siller S; Szelényi A; Herlitz L; Tonn JC; Zausinger S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):483-493. PubMed ID: 27982764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Giant pituitary adenomas: surgical outcomes of 50 cases operated on by the endonasal endoscopic approach.
Gondim JA; Almeida JP; Albuquerque LA; Gomes EF; Schops M
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):e281-90. PubMed ID: 23994073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
