These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30796556)

  • 1. In vivo comparison of key quantitative parameters measured with 3D peripheral angiography, 2D peripheral quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Zasada W; Slezak M; Pociask E; Malinowski KP; Proniewska K; Buszman P; Milewski K; Granada JF; Kaluza GL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 35(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 30796556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis.
    Porto I; Dato I; Todaro D; Calabrese M; Rigattieri S; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Burzotta F; Trani C; Crea F
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intravascular Ultrasound Validation of Contemporary Angiographic Scores Evaluating the Severity of Calcification in Peripheral Arteries.
    Yin D; Maehara A; Shimshak TM; Ricotta JJ; Ramaiah V; Foster MT; Davis TP; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Gray WA
    J Endovasc Ther; 2017 Aug; 24(4):478-487. PubMed ID: 28504047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound: imaging of the left main coronary artery.
    Spoon DB; Rubinshtein R; Psaltis PJ; Sandhu GS; Lennon R; Rihal CS; Lerman A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 81(7):1156-61. PubMed ID: 23436576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound for functional assessment of coronary lesions.
    Nishi T; Kitahara H; Fujimoto Y; Nakayama T; Sugimoto K; Takahara M; Kobayashi Y
    J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):280-286. PubMed ID: 27293021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS).
    Schuurbiers JC; Lopez NG; Ligthart J; Gijsen FJ; Dijkstra J; Serruys PW; Van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 73(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 19309696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of three dimensional quantitative coronary analysis by using rotational angiography for measurement of vessel length and diameter.
    Lee JB; Chang SG; Kim SY; Lee YS; Ryu JK; Choi JY; Kim KS; Park JS
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Oct; 28(7):1627-34. PubMed ID: 22179945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Vessel Measurements in Infra-Popliteal Endovascular Interventions: The Below-the-Knee Calibration Study.
    Kuku KO; Garcia-Garcia HM; Finizio M; Melaku GD; Wilson VA; Beyene SS; Kahsay Y; Jones-McMeans JM; Rapoza RJ; Parikh SA; DeRubertis BG; Varcoe RL; Adams GL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Feb; 35():35-41. PubMed ID: 34544659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging Versus Digital Subtraction Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease.
    Pliagas G; Saab F; Stavroulakis K; Bisdas T; Finton S; Heaney C; McGoff T; Hardy K; Adams G; Mustapha JA
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 32(3):99-103. PubMed ID: 32123141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of peripheral atherosclerosis: a comparative analysis of angiography and intravascular ultrasound imaging.
    Arthurs ZM; Bishop PD; Feiten LE; Eagleton MJ; Clair DG; Kashyap VS
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 51(4):933-8; discussion 939. PubMed ID: 20080002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA.
    Toutouzas K; Chatzizisis YS; Riga M; Giannopoulos A; Antoniadis AP; Tu S; Fujino Y; Mitsouras D; Doulaverakis C; Tsampoulatidis I; Koutkias VG; Bouki K; Li Y; Chouvarda I; Cheimariotis G; Maglaveras N; Kompatsiaris I; Nakamura S; Reiber JH; Rybicki F; Karvounis H; Stefanadis C; Tousoulis D; Giannoglou GD
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Invasive evaluation of plaque morphology of symptomatic superficial femoral artery stenoses using combined near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound.
    Zacharias SK; Safian RD; Madder RD; Hanson ID; Pica MC; Smith JL; Goldstein JA; Abbas AE
    Vasc Med; 2016 Aug; 21(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 26957574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of peripheral arterial disease: a comparative study versus standard digital angiography.
    Pavlovic C; Futamatsu H; Angiolillo DJ; Guzman LA; Wilke N; Siragusa D; Wludyka P; Percy R; Northrup M; Bass TA; Costa MA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2007 Apr; 23(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 16871428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
    Tu S; Xu L; Ligthart J; Xu B; Witberg K; Sun Z; Koning G; Reiber JH; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22261998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two and three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
    Kan J; Gao X; Sandeep KG; Xu H; Zhao Y; Chen S; Chen F
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(6):1012-21. PubMed ID: 24622427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of geometry-based methods and intra-arterial pressure measurements to assess the hemodynamic significance of equivocal iliac artery stenoses.
    Heinen SG; Huberts W; van den Heuvel DA; van de Vosse FN; de Vries JP; Delhaas T
    Vascular; 2019 Apr; 27(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 30305011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials.
    Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of angiographic and IVUS derived coronary geometric reconstructions for evaluation of the association of hemodynamics with coronary artery disease progression.
    Timmins LH; Suo J; Eshtehardi P; Molony DS; McDaniel MC; Oshinski JN; Giddens DP; Samady H
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1327-1336. PubMed ID: 27229349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial.
    Muramatsu T; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Nakatani S; Girasis C; Campos CM; Morel MA; Jonker H; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; García-García HM; Leon MB; Serruys PW; Onuma Y;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Sep; 86(3):E140-9. PubMed ID: 25914327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.