251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30796574)
41. Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity after MRI assessment and adjuvant treatment in 189 patients undergoing rectal cancer resection.
Simpson GS; Eardley N; McNicol F; Healey P; Hughes M; Rooney PS
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 29(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 24651956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Performance of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for staging rectal cancer nodes: can the initial promising results be reproduced?
Heijnen LA; Lambregts DM; Martens MH; Maas M; Bakers FC; Cappendijk VC; Oliveira P; Lammering G; Riedl RG; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RG
Eur Radiol; 2014 Feb; 24(2):371-9. PubMed ID: 24051676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Rectal cancer lexicon 2023 revised and updated consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology Colorectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel.
Lee S; Kassam Z; Baheti AD; Hope TA; Chang KJ; Korngold EK; Taggart MW; Horvat N
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Sep; 48(9):2792-2806. PubMed ID: 37145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Local staging of rectal cancer: a review of imaging.
Beets-Tan RG; Beets GL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 May; 33(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 21509856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: pelvic MRI plus abdomen and pelvic CT. Does extrahepatic abdomen imaging matter? A case for routine thoracic CT.
Adeyemo D; Hutchinson R
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Mar; 11(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 18513197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Multi-practice survey on MR imaging practice patterns in rectal cancer in the United States.
Bates DDB; Shaish H; Gollub MJ; Harisinghani M; Lall C; Sheedy SP
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Jan; 47(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 34605968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Accuracy of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in local staging for rectal cancer: a single local health district, real world experience.
Ang ZH; De Robles MS; Kang S; Winn R
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Jan; 91(1-2):111-116. PubMed ID: 33369829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Diagnostic value of 3.0-tesla high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for invasion depth of rectal cancer].
Yao X; Song X; Wang Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):668-74. PubMed ID: 27353102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. SAR user guide to the rectal MR synoptic report (primary staging).
Kassam Z; Lang R; Bates DDB; Chang KJ; Fraum TJ; Friedman KA; Golia Pernicka JS; Gollub MJ; Harisinghani M; Khatri G; Lall C; Lee S; Magnetta M; Nougaret S; Paspulati RM; Paroder V; Shaish H; Kim DH;
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Jan; 48(1):186-199. PubMed ID: 35754053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.
Lambregts DM; Beets GL; Maas M; Kessels AG; Bakers FC; Cappendijk VC; Engelen SM; Lahaye MJ; de Bruïne AP; Lammering G; Leiner T; Verwoerd JL; Wildberger JE; Beets-Tan RG
Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 21239980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prognostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in rectal cancer.
Martling A; Holm T; Bremmer S; Lindholm J; Cedermark B; Blomqvist L
Br J Surg; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1422-8. PubMed ID: 14598425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of rectal cancer. Effect of experience.
Rafaelsen SR; Sørensen T; Jakobsen A; Bisgaard C; Lindebjerg J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2008; 43(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 18365909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Accuracy of high-resolution MRI with lumen distention in rectal cancer staging and circumferential margin involvement prediction.
Iannicelli E; Di Renzo S; Ferri M; Pilozzi E; Di Girolamo M; Sapori A; Ziparo V; David V
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24497790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Keane C; Young M
ANZ J Surg; 2014 Oct; 84(10):758-62. PubMed ID: 24751125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Current controversies in TNM for the radiological staging of rectal cancer and how to deal with them: results of a global online survey and multidisciplinary expert consensus.
Lambregts DMJ; Bogveradze N; Blomqvist LK; Fokas E; Garcia-Aguilar J; Glimelius B; Gollub MJ; Konishi T; Marijnen CAM; Nagtegaal ID; Nilsson PJ; Perez RO; Snaebjornsson P; Taylor SA; Tolan DJM; Valentini V; West NP; Wolthuis A; Lahaye MJ; Maas M; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RGH
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4991-5003. PubMed ID: 35254485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Circumferential Resection Margin Status as a Predictive Factor for Recurrence in Preoperative MRI for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Therapy.
Mazaki J; Tsukamoto S; Miyake M; Moritani K; Sakamoto R; Shida D; Kanemitsu Y
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Jan; 64(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 33306533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Yeung JM; Ferris NJ; Lynch AC; Heriot AG
Future Oncol; 2009 Oct; 5(8):1295-306. PubMed ID: 19852743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?
Burton S; Brown G; Daniels IR; Norman AR; Mason B; Cunningham D;
Br J Cancer; 2006 Feb; 94(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 16465171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer.
Dewhurst CE; Mortele KJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 2013 Jan; 51(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 23182512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Structured pathology reporting improves the macroscopic assessment of rectal tumour resection specimens.
King S; Dimech M; Johnstone S
Pathology; 2016 Jun; 48(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 27114373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
