BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30796895)

  • 21. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Brainstem encoding of frequency-modulated sweeps is relevant to Mandarin concurrent-vowels identification for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Fu Z; Yang H; Chen F; Wu X; Chen J
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():123-136. PubMed ID: 31279277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intelligible speech encoded in the human brain stem frequency-following response.
    Galbraith GC; Arbagey PW; Branski R; Comerci N; Rector PM
    Neuroreport; 1995 Nov; 6(17):2363-7. PubMed ID: 8747154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of congenital blindness on the subcortical representation of speech cues.
    Jafari Z; Malayeri S
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 258():401-9. PubMed ID: 24291729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.
    Schvartz KC; Chatterjee M
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 22237163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
    Bidelman G; Powers L
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perception of concurrent vowels: effects of harmonic misalignment and pitch-period asynchrony.
    Summerfield Q; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1364-77. PubMed ID: 2030224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Roles of voice onset time and F0 in stop consonant voicing perception: effects of masking noise and low-pass filtering.
    Winn MB; Chatterjee M; Idsardi WJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1097-107. PubMed ID: 23785185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceptual warping exposes categorical representations for speech in human brainstem responses.
    Carter JA; Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2023 Apr; 269():119899. PubMed ID: 36720437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.
    Souza P; Arehart K; Miller CW; Muralimanohar RK
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20739892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.
    Bidelman GM; Krishnan A
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1355():112-25. PubMed ID: 20691672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Objective measurement of physiological signal-to-noise gain in the brainstem response to a synthetic vowel.
    Prévost F; Laroche M; Marcoux AM; Dajani HR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jan; 124(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 22688081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels.
    Assmann PF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):471-84. PubMed ID: 8120258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.
    Anderson S; Skoe E; Chandrasekaran B; Zecker S; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):151-7. PubMed ID: 20708671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Musical training orchestrates coordinated neuroplasticity in auditory brainstem and cortex to counteract age-related declines in categorical vowel perception.
    Bidelman GM; Alain C
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(3):1240-9. PubMed ID: 25609638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The time course of auditory segregation: concurrent vowels that vary in duration.
    McKeown JD; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1866-77. PubMed ID: 7593912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.
    Suresh CH; Krishnan A; Gandour JT
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():42-53. PubMed ID: 28927640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.