These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30797831)
1. Task modulates ERP effects of orthographic neighborhood for pseudowords but not words. Meade G; Grainger J; Holcomb PJ Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():385-396. PubMed ID: 30797831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency. Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M; Gómez P; Swaab TY Brain Lang; 2013 Apr; 125(1):11-27. PubMed ID: 23454070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: what is shared, what is different? Müller O; Duñabeitia JA; Carreiras M Psychophysiology; 2010 May; 47(3):455-66. PubMed ID: 20102534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Top-down modulation of brain responses in spelling error recognition. Larionova E; Garakh Z; Martynova O Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 May; 235():103891. PubMed ID: 36933384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform. Coch D; Mitra P Brain Res; 2010 May; 1329():159-74. PubMed ID: 20211607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Holcomb PJ; Grainger J; O'Rourke T J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Aug; 14(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 12191460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional modulation of orthographic neighborhood effects during reading: Evidence from event-related brain potentials in a psychological refractory period paradigm. Rabovsky M; Conrad M; Álvarez CJ; Paschke-Goldt J; Sommer W PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0199084. PubMed ID: 30682023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition. Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task. Samson D; Pillon A Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The time course of semantic ambiguity in visual word recognition: behavioral and ERP evidence for the lexical-semantic effect. Kim J; Kim S; Nam K Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1378125. PubMed ID: 39045435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading. Snell J; Meade G; Meeter M; Holcomb P; Grainger J Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():276-283. PubMed ID: 31002854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading. Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthographic neighborhood effects as a function of word frequency: an event-related potential study. Vergara-Martínez M; Swaab TY Psychophysiology; 2012 Sep; 49(9):1277-89. PubMed ID: 22803612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring the influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word recognition with the N400: Evidence for semantic scaffolding. Yates M; Shelley-Tremblay J; Knapp DL Brain Lang; 2020 Dec; 211():104866. PubMed ID: 33074109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Many neighbors are not silent. fMRI evidence for global lexical activity in visual word recognition. Braun M; Jacobs AM; Richlan F; Hawelka S; Hutzler F; Kronbichler M Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():423. PubMed ID: 26257634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the time course of lexical activation and competition in spoken word recognition affected by adult aging? An event-related potential (ERP) study. Hunter CR Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():451-464. PubMed ID: 27616158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing. Gutierrez-Sigut E; Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12321. PubMed ID: 31444497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]