These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30797991)

  • 21. Co-actors represent the order of each other's actions.
    Schmitz L; Vesper C; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Cognition; 2018 Dec; 181():65-79. PubMed ID: 30142512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporal coordination between performing musicians.
    Loehr JD; Palmer C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Nov; 64(11):2153-67. PubMed ID: 21929475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: an EEG study.
    Kourtis D; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22671131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distinct kinematic markers of demonstration and joint action coordination? Evidence from virtual xylophone playing.
    McEllin L; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):885-897. PubMed ID: 29154627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modulation of Rolandic Beta-Band Oscillations during Motor Simulation of Joint Actions.
    Ménoret M; Bourguignon M; Hari R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131655. PubMed ID: 26151634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can discrete joint action be synergistic? Studying the stabilization of interpersonal hand coordination.
    Romero V; Kallen R; Riley MA; Richardson MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1223-35. PubMed ID: 26052696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Planning my actions to accommodate yours: joint action development during early childhood.
    Meyer M; van der Wel RP; Hunnius S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 May; 371(1693):. PubMed ID: 27069048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Endogenous rhythms influence interpersonal synchrony.
    Zamm A; Wellman C; Palmer C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):611-6. PubMed ID: 26820249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Joint action in a cooperative precision task: nested processes of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination.
    Ramenzoni VC; Davis TJ; Riley MA; Shockley K; Baker AA
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):447-57. PubMed ID: 21479660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Agents' pivotality and reward fairness modulate sense of agency in cooperative joint action.
    Le Bars S; Devaux A; Nevidal T; Chambon V; Pacherie E
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104117. PubMed ID: 31751814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A matter of you versus me? Experiences of control in a joint go/no-go task.
    van der Weiden A; Liepelt R; van Haren NEM
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):842-851. PubMed ID: 28840393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Planning and coordination of utterances in a joint naming task.
    Hoedemaker RS; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):732-752. PubMed ID: 29999401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination.
    Vesper C; van der Wel RP; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):517-30. PubMed ID: 21556820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Collaborating in spatial tasks: how partners coordinate their spatial memories and descriptions.
    Galati A; Avraamides MN
    Cogn Process; 2013 May; 14(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 23413001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Following during physically-coupled joint action engages motion area MT+/V5.
    Chauvigné LAS; Belyk M; Brown S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2017; 16(3):307-318. PubMed ID: 28891519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The fruits of our labour: Interpersonal coordination generates commitment by signalling a willingness to adapt.
    McEllin L; Felber A; Michael J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jan; 76(1):147-159. PubMed ID: 35084277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Plasticity in leader-follower roles in human teams.
    Nakayama S; Ruiz Marín M; Camacho M; Porfiri M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):14562. PubMed ID: 29109413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Entrainment and task co-representation effects for discrete and continuous action sequences.
    van der Wel RP; Fu E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1685-91. PubMed ID: 25911443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sociomotor actions: Anticipated partner responses are primarily represented in terms of spatial, not anatomical features.
    Weller L; Pfister R; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1104-1118. PubMed ID: 31135168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interactor's body shape does not affect visuo-motor interference effects during motor coordination.
    Gandolfo M; Era V; Tieri G; Sacheli LM; Candidi M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():42-50. PubMed ID: 30986565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.