These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30799116)

  • 1. Technical note: Methods for interim prediction of single-step breeding values for young animals.
    Pimentel ECG; Edel C; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3266-3273. PubMed ID: 30799116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient large-scale single-step evaluations and indirect genomic prediction of genotyped selection candidates.
    Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Darbaghshahi SN; Evans R; Calus MPL; Veerkamp R; Cromie A; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):37. PubMed ID: 37291510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of breeding values in small genotyped populations using different sources of external information-A simulation study.
    Andonov S; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Pocrnic I; Tsuruta S; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):395-401. PubMed ID: 28341049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a single-step with a multistep single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model for genomic evaluation of conformation traits in German Holsteins.
    Alkhoder H; Liu Z; Segelke D; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Apr; 105(4):3306-3322. PubMed ID: 35181130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian single-step genomic evaluations combining local and foreign information in Walloon Holsteins.
    Colinet FG; Vandenplas J; Vanderick S; Hammami H; Mota RR; Gillon A; Hubin X; Bertozzi C; Gengler N
    Animal; 2018 May; 12(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 29032781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.
    Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():79. PubMed ID: 26464226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction accuracies and genetic parameters for test-day traits from genomic and pedigree-based random regression models with or without heat stress interactions.
    Bohlouli M; Alijani S; Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):488-502. PubMed ID: 30343923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short communication: Calculating analytical reliabilities for single-step predictions.
    Edel C; Pimentel ECG; Erbe M; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3259-3265. PubMed ID: 30738687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
    Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical note: Equivalent genomic models with a residual polygenic effect.
    Liu Z; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2016-2025. PubMed ID: 26723117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects.
    Liu Z; Goddard ME; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5833-50. PubMed ID: 25022678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.
    Aguilar I; Misztal I; Johnson DL; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Feb; 93(2):743-52. PubMed ID: 20105546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.
    Garcia ALS; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32374831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving genetic evaluation using a multitrait single-step genomic model for ability to resume cycling after calving, measured by activity tags in Holstein cows.
    Ismael A; Løvendahl P; Fogh A; Lund MS; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Oct; 100(10):8188-8196. PubMed ID: 28780110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction in Brangus cattle by adding animals with imputed low-density SNP genotypes.
    Lopes FB; Wu XL; Li H; Xu J; Perkins T; Genho J; Ferretti R; Tait RG; Bauck S; Rosa GJM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Feb; 135(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 29345073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.