199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30799123)
21. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses].
Yao JP; Niu LJ; Wang Y; Geng CY; Chang Q; Chen Y; Zhu L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Subcategorization of Suspicious Breast Lesions (BI-RADS Category 4) According to MRI Criteria: Role of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Maltez de Almeida JR; Gomes AB; Barros TP; Fahel PE; de Seixas Rocha M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):222-31. PubMed ID: 26102403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Downgrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study.
Neuschler EI; Lavin PT; Tucker FL; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Dogan BE; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Young CA; Butler R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):689-700. PubMed ID: 29975115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A multiparametric classification system for lesions detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Istomin A; Masarwah A; Okuma H; Sutela A; Vanninen R; Sudah M
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109322. PubMed ID: 33045483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Usefulness of combined BI-RADS analysis and Nakagami statistics of ultrasound echoes in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Dobruch-Sobczak K; Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska H; Roszkowska-Purska K; Nowicki A; Jakubowski W
Clin Radiol; 2017 Apr; 72(4):339.e7-339.e15. PubMed ID: 28038779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Combination of different types of elastography in downgrading ultrasound Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System category 4a breast lesions.
Zheng X; Huang Y; Wang Y; Liu Y; Li F; Han J; Wang J; Cao L; Zhou J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(2):423-432. PubMed ID: 30515679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical implications of subcategorizing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions associated with microcalcification: a radiology-pathology correlation study.
Sanders MA; Roland L; Sahoo S
Breast J; 2010; 16(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19929890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features.
Mohapatra SK; Mishra A; Sahoo TK; Nayak RB; Das PK; Nayak B
Indian J Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 12(1):182-189. PubMed ID: 33814852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Subclassification of BI-RADS 4 Magnetic Resonance Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Li J; Zheng H; Cai W; Wang Y; Zhang H; Liao M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(6):914-920. PubMed ID: 33196599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Downgrading of Breast Masses Suspicious for Cancer by Using Optoacoustic Breast Imaging.
Menezes GLG; Pijnappel RM; Meeuwis C; Bisschops R; Veltman J; Lavin PT; van de Vijver MJ; Mann RM
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):355-365. PubMed ID: 29664342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Value of breast MRI omics features and clinical characteristics in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 breast lesions: an analysis of radiomics-based diagnosis.
Cui Q; Sun L; Zhang Y; Zhao Z; Li S; Liu Y; Ge H; Qin D; Zhao Y
Ann Transl Med; 2021 Nov; 9(22):1677. PubMed ID: 34988186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Application of Deep Learning to Reduce the Rate of Malignancy Among BI-RADS 4A Breast Lesions Based on Ultrasonography.
Zhao Z; Hou S; Li S; Sheng D; Liu Q; Chang C; Chen J; Li J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Nov; 48(11):2267-2275. PubMed ID: 36055860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Utility of BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions for Screening Breast MRI.
Strigel RM; Burnside ES; Elezaby M; Fowler AM; Kelcz F; Salkowski LR; DeMartini WB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1392-1399. PubMed ID: 28792802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adjunctive targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the work-up of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4 lesions.
Zhang XL; Guan J; Li MZ; Liu MJ; Guo Y; Zheng YL; Yang Z; Yang JY
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 27162117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultrasound Elastography Combined With BI-RADS-US Classification System: Is It Helpful for the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Ultrasonography?
Hao SY; Jiang QC; Zhong WJ; Zhao XB; Yao JY; Li LJ; Luo BM; Ou B; Zhi H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Jun; 16(3):e33-41. PubMed ID: 26639065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The value of MRI for downgrading of breast suspicious lesions detected on ultrasound.
Xie Z; Xu W; Zhang H; Li L; An Y; Mao G
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jun; 23(1):72. PubMed ID: 37271827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
