These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30799411)
1. Reliability of Telephone Interview for Assessment of Long-Term Stroke Outcomes: Evidence from Interrater Analysis. Chen XW; Shafei MN; Abdullah JM; Musa KI Neuroepidemiology; 2019; 52(3-4):214-219. PubMed ID: 30799411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The reliability of the german version of the barthel-index and the development of a postal and telephone version for the application on stroke patients]. Heuschmann PU; Kolominsky-Rabas PL; Nolte CH; Hünermund G; Ruf HU; Laumeier I; Meyrer R; Alberti T; Rahmann A; Kurth T; Berger K Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2005 Feb; 73(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 15685491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a structured interview for telephone assessment of the modified Rankin Scale in Brazilian stroke patients. Baggio JA; Santos-Pontelli TE; Cougo-Pinto PT; Camilo M; Silva NF; Antunes P; Machado L; Leite JP; Pontes-Neto OM Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014; 38(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 25412853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview. Wilson JT; Hareendran A; Hendry A; Potter J; Bone I; Muir KW Stroke; 2005 Apr; 36(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 15718510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prestroke modified rankin stroke scale has moderate interobserver reliability and validity in an acute stroke setting. Fearon P; McArthur KS; Garrity K; Graham LJ; McGroarty G; Vincent S; Quinn TJ Stroke; 2012 Dec; 43(12):3184-8. PubMed ID: 23150650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and interrater reliability testing of a telephone interview training programme for Australian nurse interviewers. Ahern T; Gardner A; Gardner G; Middleton S; Della P Nurse Educ Today; 2013 May; 33(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 22658374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Barthel index in a Middle-East country: translation, validity and reliability. Oveisgharan S; Shirani S; Ghorbani A; Soltanzade A; Baghaei A; Hosseini S; Sarrafzadegan N Cerebrovasc Dis; 2006; 22(5-6):350-4. PubMed ID: 16888374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale. Wilson JT; Hareendran A; Grant M; Baird T; Schulz UG; Muir KW; Bone I Stroke; 2002 Sep; 33(9):2243-6. PubMed ID: 12215594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of simple questions in assessing short- and long-term outcome in Norwegian stroke patients. Berge E; Fjaertoft H; Indredavik B; Sandset PM Cerebrovasc Dis; 2001; 11(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 11385209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of telephone and face-to-face assessment of the modified Rankin Scale. Janssen PM; Visser NA; Dorhout Mees SM; Klijn CJ; Algra A; Rinkel GJ Cerebrovasc Dis; 2010 Jan; 29(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 19955737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phone and Video-Based Modalities of Central Blinded Adjudication of Modified Rankin Scores in an Endovascular Stroke Trial. López-Cancio E; Salvat M; Cerdà N; Jiménez M; Codas J; Llull L; Boned S; Cano LM; Lara B; Molina C; Cobo E; Dávalos A; Jovin TG; Serena J; Stroke; 2015 Dec; 46(12):3405-10. PubMed ID: 26542697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke has good inter-rater-reliability but questionable validity. Zhao H; Collier JM; Quah DM; Purvis T; Bernhardt J Cerebrovasc Dis; 2010 Jan; 29(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 20029188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abbreviation of the Follow-Up NIH Stroke Scale Using Factor Analysis. Raza SA; Frankel MR; Rangaraju S Cerebrovasc Dis Extra; 2017; 7(3):120-129. PubMed ID: 28968607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural adaptation and structured interviewing. Cincura C; Pontes-Neto OM; Neville IS; Mendes HF; Menezes DF; Mariano DC; Pereira IF; Teixeira LA; Jesus PA; de Queiroz DC; Pereira DF; Pinto E; Leite JP; Lopes AA; Oliveira-Filho J Cerebrovasc Dis; 2009; 27(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 19039215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of ratings on the Glasgow Outcome Scales from in-person and telephone structured interviews. Pettigrew LE; Wilson JT; Teasdale GM J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2003; 18(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 12802167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified Rankin scale with expanded guidance scheme and interview questionnaire: interrater agreement and reproducibility of assessment. Shinohara Y; Minematsu K; Amano T; Ohashi Y Cerebrovasc Dis; 2006; 21(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 16446542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified Rankin scale assessment by telephone using a simple questionnaire. Yi K; Nakajima M; Ikeda T; Yoshigai M; Ueda M J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2022 Oct; 31(10):106695. PubMed ID: 36054972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial testing of an electronic application of the simplified modified Rankin Scale questionnaire (e-smRSq). Dutta D; Foy C; Ramadurai G; Obaid M; Bruno A J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2020 Sep; 29(9):105024. PubMed ID: 32807439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and validity of telephonic Barthel Index: an experience from multi-centric randomized control study. Prasad K; Kumar A; Misra S; Yadav AK; Johri S; Sarkar RS; Gorthi SP; Hassan KM; Prabhakar S; Misra UK; Kumar P; Acta Neurol Belg; 2018 Mar; 118(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 29368116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of a telephone-based Glasgow Outcome Scale assessment using a structured interview in a heterogenous population of patients and examiners. LeGrand SA; Hindman BJ; Dexter F; Moss LG; Todd MM J Neurotrauma; 2007 Sep; 24(9):1437-46. PubMed ID: 17892406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]