These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30799689)

  • 1. Ratio Format Shapes Health Decisions: The Practical Significance of the "1-in-X" Effect.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Jan; 39(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 30799689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health Professionals Prefer to Communicate Risk-Related Numerical Information Using "1-in-X" Ratios.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R; Walasek L; Bhatia S
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):366-376. PubMed ID: 29068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "1-in-X" bias: "1-in-X" format causes overestimation of health-related risks.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Bonnefon JF
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Dec; 24(4):431-439. PubMed ID: 30247046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decisive evidence on a smaller-than-you-think phenomenon: revisiting the "1-in-X" effect on subjective medical probabilities.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Kostopoulou O; Hanak R
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 24310649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.
    Edwards AG; Evans R; Dundon J; Haigh S; Hood K; Elwyn GJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Oct; (4):CD001865. PubMed ID: 17054144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about entering screening programs.
    Edwards A; Unigwe S; Elwyn G; Hood K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD001865. PubMed ID: 12535419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment decision-making and the form of risk communication: results of a factorial survey.
    Hembroff LA; Holmes-Rovner M; Wills CE
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2004 Nov; 4():20. PubMed ID: 15546488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shared Medical Decision Making in Lung Cancer Screening: Experienced versus Descriptive Risk Formats.
    Fraenkel L; Peters E; Tyra S; Oelberg D
    Med Decis Making; 2016 May; 36(4):518-25. PubMed ID: 26442791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.
    Elwyn G; Edwards A; Hood K; Robling M; Atwell C; Russell I; Wensing M; Grol R;
    Fam Pract; 2004 Aug; 21(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 15249520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating tailored risk information of cancer treatment side effects: Only words or also numbers?
    Vromans RD; Pauws SC; Bol N; van de Poll-Franse LV; Krahmer EJ
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Oct; 20(1):277. PubMed ID: 33109175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study.
    McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The 1-in-X effect on the subjective assessment of medical probabilities.
    Pighin S; Savadori L; Barilli E; Cremonesi L; Ferrari M; Bonnefon JF
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(5):721-9. PubMed ID: 21512187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.
    Kehl KL; Landrum MB; Arora NK; Ganz PA; van Ryn M; Mack JW; Keating NL
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Apr; 1(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 26182303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of prognostic data presentation format on perceived risk among surrogate decision makers of critically ill patients: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chapman AR; Litton E; Chamberlain J; Ho KM
    J Crit Care; 2015 Apr; 30(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 25480457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communicating weather forecast uncertainty: Do individual differences matter?
    Grounds MA; Joslyn SL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Mar; 24(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 29595302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of qualitative vs. quantitative presentation of probability estimates on patient decision-making: a randomized trial.
    Man-Son-Hing M; O'Connor AM; Drake E; Biggs J; Hum V; Laupacis A
    Health Expect; 2002 Sep; 5(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 12199663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: the effects of adolescent gender and research risk.
    Brody JL; Scherer DG; Annett RD; Turner C; Dalen J
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e356-62. PubMed ID: 16882778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.
    Barker F; Mackenzie E; Elliott L; Jones S; de Lusignan S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD010342. PubMed ID: 25019297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.