These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30800091)

  • 1. Neurophysiological Activations of Predictive and Non-predictive Exogenous Cues: A Cue-Elicited EEG Study on the Generation of Inhibition of Return.
    Vivas AB; Paraskevopoulos E; Castillo A; Fuentes LJ
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():227. PubMed ID: 30800091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
    Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of return effect in exogenous orienting.
    Yang D; Yao S; Ding C; Qi S; Lei Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Sep; 221(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 22791229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating inhibition of return from endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks.
    Chica AB; Lupianez J; Bartolomeo P
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2006 Oct; 23(7):1015-34. PubMed ID: 21049365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensory adaptation and inhibition of return: dissociating multiple inhibitory cueing effects.
    Lim A; Eng V; Janssen SMJ; Satel J
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1369-1382. PubMed ID: 29520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertical asymmetries and inhibition of return: effects of spatial and non-spatial cueing on behavior and visual ERPs.
    Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Pazo-Álvarez P; Doallo S; Fuentes LJ; Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 24342058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is Inhibition of Return Modulated by Involuntary Orienting of Spatial Attention: An ERP Study.
    Pan F; Wu X; Zhang L
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():113. PubMed ID: 28197120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial Inhibition of Return promotes changes in response-related mu and beta oscillatory patterns.
    Amenedo E; Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Darriba Á; Pazo-Álvarez P
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 310():616-28. PubMed ID: 26456119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return.
    Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The causal role of the left parietal lobe in facilitation and inhibition of return.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Lupiáñez J; Narganes-Pineda C; Marino G; Colás I; Chica AB
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():311-322. PubMed ID: 31185374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visually Induced Inhibition of Return Affects the Integration of Auditory and Visual Information.
    Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TCW; Spence C
    Perception; 2017 Jan; 46(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 27484341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Emotional Faces Affect Inhibition of Return? An ERP Study.
    Jia L; Wang J; Zhang K; Ma H; Sun HJ
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():721. PubMed ID: 31001175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exogenous cuing of distractor location facilitates location selection by inhibition of return.
    Chao HF
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 19261587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of scene removal on inhibition of return in a cue-target task.
    Redden RS; Klages J; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 27804031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition of return in time-lapse: Brain Rhythms during grip force control for spatial attention.
    Zappasodi F; Croce P; Di Matteo R; Brunetti M
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Dec; 163():108068. PubMed ID: 34687747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition of return is no hallmark of exogenous capture by unconscious cues.
    Fuchs I; Ansorge U
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():30. PubMed ID: 22375115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.
    Lupiáñez J; Milliken B; Solano C; Weaver B; Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):753-73. PubMed ID: 11548033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological modulations of exogenous attention by intervening events.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Mar; 85():239-50. PubMed ID: 24463767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.