These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3080096)

  • 41. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Lurie S; Sadan O; Golan A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):426-7; author reply 427. PubMed ID: 16449136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The use of the vacuum extractor: a reappraisal.
    Matheson GW; Davajan V; Mishell DR
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1968; 47(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 5709214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Experiences with the use of a personal model of the vacuum extractor].
    Nowosad K; Reszczyński A; Weinbrenner L; Krzaklewski S
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1970 Feb; 92(6):185-8. PubMed ID: 5523034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Value of the eccentric grasping forceps. Indication and limitations of vacuum extraction].
    Georgiades E; Janisch H; Palmrich AH; Reinold E
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1970 Sep; 30(9):813-8. PubMed ID: 5523903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cephalhaematoma following vacuum extraction.
    Fahmy K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1971 Apr; 78(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 5558321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Maternal and neonatal trauma during forceps and vacuum delivery must not be overlooked.
    Muraca GM; Ralph LE; Christensen P; D'Souza R; Geoffrion R; Lisonkova S; Joseph KS
    BMJ; 2023 Oct; 383():e073991. PubMed ID: 37857419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Instrumental rotational delivery in primiparae.
    Gleeson NC; Gormally SM; Morrison JJ; O'Regan M
    Ir Med J; 1992 Dec; 85(4):139-41. PubMed ID: 1473948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Vacuum versus forceps].
    Dapunt O; Heim K; Weiss D
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1993; 33 Suppl 1():157-61. PubMed ID: 8118251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Vacuum extraction from pelvic entrance].
    Feuerstein H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1968 Dec; 90(49):1663-72. PubMed ID: 5751387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Forceps versus vacuum].
    Gruber W; Chalubinski K; Ulm M
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1993; 33 Suppl 1():162-4. PubMed ID: 8118253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Macular hole in a newborn associated with forceps delivery.
    Casillas M; Bazard MC; Hubert I; Berrod JP
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2010 Dec; 47 Online():e1-3. PubMed ID: 21175117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Damron DP
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):739-40; author reply 740. PubMed ID: 16507949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Neonatal and maternal complications among pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps extraction.
    Kovavisarach E; Varanuntakul T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr; 82(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 10410490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Traumatic intracranial haemorrhage in firstborn infants and delivery with obstetric forceps.
    O'Driscoll K; Meagher D; MacDonald D; Geoghegan F
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Jun; 88(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 7248214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The role of rotational forceps.
    Hardy C; Roberts R
    BJOG; 2014 Apr; 121(5):641-2. PubMed ID: 24636313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reintroducing Kielland forceps.
    Thorp JM
    BJOG; 2014 Apr; 121(5):547. PubMed ID: 24636312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The role of rotational forceps.
    Dickson MJ
    BJOG; 2013 Oct; 120(11):1438. PubMed ID: 24034520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Rotational forceps. Is it safe? A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour.
    Ekechi CI
    BJOG; 2014 Apr; 121(5):644. PubMed ID: 24636318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.