154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30801468)
21. Re-use of explanted osteosynthesis devices: a reliable and inexpensive reprocessing protocol.
Danesi V; Cristofolini L; Stea S; Traina F; Beraudi A; Tersi L; Harman M; Viceconti M
Injury; 2011 Oct; 42(10):1101-6. PubMed ID: 21376315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stakeholder perspectives on scaling up medical device reprocessing: A qualitative study.
Hennein R; Goddard E; Sherman JD
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0279808. PubMed ID: 36584081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Introduction to the MAUDE database.
Gurtcheff SE
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 51(1):120-3. PubMed ID: 18303506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sterility and microbiological assessment of reused single-use cardiac electrophysiology catheters.
Tessarolo F; Caola I; Caciagli P; Guarrera GM; Nollo G
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 27(12):1385-92. PubMed ID: 17152039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices used during hemodynamic procedures in Brazil: a widespread and largely overlooked problem.
Amarante JM; Toscano CM; Pearson ML; Roth V; Jarvis WR; Levin AS
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 29(9):854-8. PubMed ID: 18647118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reprocessing Standards for Medical Devices and Equipment in Otolaryngology: Safe Practices for Scopes, Speculums, and Single-Use Devices.
Chang CWD; Brenner MJ; Shuman EK; Kokoska MS
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 52(1):173-183. PubMed ID: 30262168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Leiomyomas: Review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.
Young RJ; Puma L; Latham M; Kho KA
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jul; 142(1):147-150. PubMed ID: 37348092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Endometrial ablation devices: review of a manufacturer and user facility device experience database.
Della Badia C; Nyirjesy P; Atogho A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 17630160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing organic material on single-use vessel sealing devices: a comparative study of reprocessed and new LigaSure™ devices.
Chivukula SR; Lammers S; Wagner J
Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4539-4549. PubMed ID: 32909208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30.
Liebel TC; Daugherty T; Kirsch A; Omar SA; Feuerstein T
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2020; 54(3):178-188. PubMed ID: 32442013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adverse events related to total ankle replacement devices: an analysis of reports to the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Mahmoud K; Metikala S; O'Connor KM; Farber DC
Int Orthop; 2021 Sep; 45(9):2307-2312. PubMed ID: 33575857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Action steps for safe use of reprocessed single-use medical devices.
OR Manager; 2016 Nov; 32(11):20-4. PubMed ID: 29978985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of performance characteristics between new and reprocessed electrophysiology catheters.
Lester BR; Alexander AA; Miller K; Boser NP; Sullivan BF; Brucker GG
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 17(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 17226083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Specific hygiene issues relating to reprocessing and reuse of single-use devices for laparoscopic surgery.
Roth K; Heeg P; Reichl R
Surg Endosc; 2002 Jul; 16(7):1091-7. PubMed ID: 12165829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Safety and cost-effectiveness of single-use endolaser probe reprocessing in vitreoretinal surgery.
Zacharias LC; da Silva Conci L; Megnis BP; Falabretti JG; Dos Santos Rodrigues Neto T; da Silva Neto ED; Preti RC; Cunha LP; Monteiro MLR
Int J Retina Vitreous; 2021 Mar; 7(1):22. PubMed ID: 33731215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Functional properties and performance of new and reprocessed coronary angioplasty balloon catheters.
Fedel M; Tessarolo F; Ferrari P; Lösche C; Ghassemieh N; Guarrera GM; Nollo G
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Aug; 78(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 16506183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Safety profiles of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure devices: An analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database from 2009 to 2016.
Jazayeri MA; Vuddanda V; Turagam MK; Parikh V; Lavu M; Atkins D; Earnest M; Di Biase L; Natale A; Wilber D; Reddy YM; Lakkireddy DR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28988455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: an analysis of 1399 reports to the FDA.
Fuller J; Ashar BS; Carey-Corrado J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 16036187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reprocessed single-use devices and the FDA: additional information for radiologists.
Shratter LA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jun; 178(6):1570; author reply 1571. PubMed ID: 12034643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A Multi-techniques Approach to assess reprocessing of Single-use electrosurgical pencils.
Tessarolo F; Torres S; Ballesteros L; Rigoni M; Piccoli F; Caola I; Montoya Y; Nollo G
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():6876-9. PubMed ID: 26737873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
