BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30801476)

  • 1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 769: Reprocessed Single-Use Devices.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 133(3):e235-e237. PubMed ID: 30801476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 769 Summary: Reprocessed Single-Use Devices.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 133(3):600-601. PubMed ID: 30801468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Committee opinion no. 537: reprocessed single-use devices.
    Committee on Gynecologic Practice, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):974-6. PubMed ID: 22996127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing and Adopting New Medical Devices for Obstetric and Gynecologic Care: ACOG Committee Opinion Summary, Number 801.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 135(4):985-986. PubMed ID: 32217971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing and Adopting New Medical Devices for Obstetric and Gynecologic Care: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 801.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 135(4):e160-e166. PubMed ID: 32217977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience database that inspired the United States Food and Drug Administration's Reclassification of transvaginal mesh.
    Sandberg JM; Gray I; Pearlman A; Terlecki RP
    Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Mar; 59(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 29520389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reprocessing single-use medical devices.
    Cohoon BD
    AORN J; 2002 Mar; 75(3):557-62, 565-7. PubMed ID: 11921823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Research and Reflection on Reprocessed Medical Devices Supervision].
    Yang X; Xu W; Wang Y; Tian J
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 42(4):286-288. PubMed ID: 30112897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re-use of explanted osteosynthesis devices: a reliable and inexpensive reprocessing protocol.
    Danesi V; Cristofolini L; Stea S; Traina F; Beraudi A; Tersi L; Harman M; Viceconti M
    Injury; 2011 Oct; 42(10):1101-6. PubMed ID: 21376315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Cost Influence the Choice of Disposable Versus Reusable Instruments? Mailed Survey of Obstetrician/Gynaecologists.
    Yang H; Capstick VA; Bentz C; Ross S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1416-1422. PubMed ID: 30885506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endometrial ablation devices: review of a manufacturer and user facility device experience database.
    Della Badia C; Nyirjesy P; Atogho A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 17630160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reprocessed bipolar energy for laparoscopic colectomy: Is it worth it?
    Brady JT; Bhakta A; Steele SR; Trunzo JA; Senagore AJ; Holmgren K; Schillero A; Champagne BJ
    Am J Surg; 2017 Jul; 214(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 28279396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing single-use medical devices for use in surgery - importance, status quo and potential.
    Krüger CM
    GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip; 2008 Sep; 3(3):Doc21. PubMed ID: 20204093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
    Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reuse of single-use medical devices: informed consent and physician liability.
    Colonna TE; Thomas DE
    Tex Med; 1999 Mar; 95(3):64-7. PubMed ID: 10932637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What do you mean you can't sterilize it? The reusable medical device matrix.
    Stephens A; Assang A
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 2010 Dec; 28(4):6-11, 20-4. PubMed ID: 21366000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbiological, microstructure, and material science examinations of reprocessed Combitubes after multiple reuse.
    Lipp MD; Jaehnichen G; Golecki N; Fecht G; Reichl R; Heeg P
    Anesth Analg; 2000 Sep; 91(3):693-7. PubMed ID: 10960402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sterility and microbiological assessment of reused single-use cardiac electrophysiology catheters.
    Tessarolo F; Caola I; Caciagli P; Guarrera GM; Nollo G
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 27(12):1385-92. PubMed ID: 17152039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices used during hemodynamic procedures in Brazil: a widespread and largely overlooked problem.
    Amarante JM; Toscano CM; Pearson ML; Roth V; Jarvis WR; Levin AS
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 29(9):854-8. PubMed ID: 18647118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.