177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30801545)
1. Geographic Disparity in Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Rates Following Share 35.
Bowring MG; Zhou S; Chow EKH; Massie AB; Segev DL; Gentry SE
Transplantation; 2019 Oct; 103(10):2113-2120. PubMed ID: 30801545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors that affect deceased donor liver transplantation rates in the United States in addition to the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score.
Sharma P; Schaubel DE; Messersmith EE; Guidinger MK; Merion RM
Liver Transpl; 2012 Dec; 18(12):1456-63. PubMed ID: 22965903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.
Locke JE; Shelton BA; Olthoff KM; Pomfret EA; Forde KA; Sawinski D; Gray M; Ascher NL
JAMA Surg; 2020 Jul; 155(7):e201129. PubMed ID: 32432699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Racial and ethnic disparities in access to liver transplantation.
Mathur AK; Schaubel DE; Gong Q; Guidinger MK; Merion RM
Liver Transpl; 2010 Sep; 16(9):1033-40. PubMed ID: 20818740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score-based Allocation System in Korea: A Nationwide Study.
Lee J; Kim DG; Lee JY; Lee JG; Joo DJ; Kim SI; Kim MS
Transplantation; 2019 Dec; 103(12):2515-2522. PubMed ID: 30985735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heterogeneous Circles for Liver Allocation.
Wood NL; Kernodle AB; Hartley AJ; Segev DL; Gentry SE
Hepatology; 2021 Jul; 74(1):312-321. PubMed ID: 33219592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex Disparity in Liver Transplant and Access to Living Donation.
Karnam RS; Chen S; Xu W; Chen C; Elangainesan P; Ghanekar A; McGilvray I; Reichman T; Sayed B; Selzner M; Sapisochin G; Galvin Z; Hirschfield G; Asrani SK; Selzner N; Cattral M; Lilly L; Bhat M
JAMA Surg; 2021 Nov; 156(11):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 34406347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geographic disparity in kidney transplantation under KAS.
Zhou S; Massie AB; Luo X; Ruck JM; Chow EKH; Bowring MG; Bae S; Segev DL; Gentry SE
Am J Transplant; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1415-1423. PubMed ID: 29232040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.
Haugen CE; Ishaque T; Sapirstein A; Cauneac A; Segev DL; Gentry S
Am J Transplant; 2019 Jul; 19(7):2044-2052. PubMed ID: 30748095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Geographic disparities in lung transplant rates.
Kosztowski M; Zhou S; Bush E; Higgins RS; Segev DL; Gentry SE
Am J Transplant; 2019 May; 19(5):1491-1497. PubMed ID: 30431704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Addressing geographic disparities in liver transplantation through redistricting.
Gentry SE; Massie AB; Cheek SW; Lentine KL; Chow EH; Wickliffe CE; Dzebashvili N; Salvalaggio PR; Schnitzler MA; Axelrod DA; Segev DL
Am J Transplant; 2013 Aug; 13(8):2052-8. PubMed ID: 23837931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.
Sharma P; Balan V; Hernandez JL; Harper AM; Edwards EB; Rodriguez-Luna H; Byrne T; Vargas HE; Mulligan D; Rakela J; Wiesner RH
Liver Transpl; 2004 Jan; 10(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 14755775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reassessing the survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation: retrospective cohort study.
Malamon JS; Kaplan B; Jackson WE; Saben JL; Schold JD; Pomfret EA; Pomposelli JJ
Int J Surg; 2023 Sep; 109(9):2714-2720. PubMed ID: 37226874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Offer acceptance practices and geographic variability in allocation model for end-stage liver disease at transplant.
Wey A; Pyke J; Schladt DP; Gentry SE; Weaver T; Salkowski N; Kasiske BL; Israni AK; Snyder JJ
Liver Transpl; 2018 Apr; 24(4):478-487. PubMed ID: 29316203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraregional model for end-stage liver disease score variation in liver transplantation: Disparity in our own backyard.
Croome KP; Lee DD; Burns JM; Keaveny AP; Taner CB
Liver Transpl; 2018 Apr; 24(4):488-496. PubMed ID: 29365357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liver transplant recipient survival benefit with living donation in the model for endstage liver disease allocation era.
Berg CL; Merion RM; Shearon TH; Olthoff KM; Brown RS; Baker TB; Everson GT; Hong JC; Terrault N; Hayashi PH; Fisher RA; Everhart JE
Hepatology; 2011 Oct; 54(4):1313-21. PubMed ID: 21688284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of the allocation system for deceased donor liver transplantation.
Coombes JM; Trotter JF
Clin Med Res; 2005 May; 3(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 16012126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of living donor liver transplantation varies with the availability of deceased donor liver transplantation.
Vagefi PA; Ascher NL; Freise CE; Dodge JL; Roberts JP
Liver Transpl; 2012 Feb; 18(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 22006378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of rates and severity of chronic kidney disease in deceased-donor and living-donor liver transplant recipients: times matter.
Yankol Y; Bugeaud E; Zens T; Rizzari M; Mecit N; Leverson GE; Foley D; Mezrich JD; Kanmaz T; Andaçoğlu OM; D'Alessandro AM; Acarlı KS; Kalayoğlu M; Fernandez LA
Turk J Med Sci; 2021 Apr; 51(2):610-622. PubMed ID: 33037873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes for liver transplant candidates listed with low model for end-stage liver disease score.
Kwong AJ; Lai JC; Dodge JL; Roberts JP
Liver Transpl; 2015 Nov; 21(11):1403-9. PubMed ID: 26289624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
