These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30801889)

  • 1. Vaginoscopy Against Standard Treatment: a randomised controlled trial.
    Smith PP; Kolhe S; O'Connor S; Clark TJ
    BJOG; 2019 Jun; 126(7):891-899. PubMed ID: 30801889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaginoscopy for office hysteroscopy: A systematic review & meta-analysis.
    De Silva PM; Carnegy A; Smith PP; Clark TJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 252():278-285. PubMed ID: 32645643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Vaginoscopy versus Conventional Hysteroscopy on Pain, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction in Patients with Endometrial Polyps.
    Liao L; Peng Y; Lu J; Wang Z; Xu J; Chen X; Chen H; Zhang X
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():3835941. PubMed ID: 35799662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome comparison between vaginoscopy and standard hysteroscopy: A retrospective cohort study.
    Tien CT; Li PC; Ding DC
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2021 May; 84(5):536-539. PubMed ID: 33770053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of pain in diagnostic hysteroscopy by vaginoscopy using normal saline at body temperature as distension medium: a randomized controlled trial].
    Almeida ZM; Pontes R; Costa Hde L
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 30(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 19142539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review of the effect on pain.
    Cooper NA; Smith P; Khan KS; Clark TJ
    BJOG; 2010 Apr; 117(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 20374594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vaginoscopy compared to traditional hysteroscopy for hysteroscopic sterilization. A randomized trial.
    Chapa HO; Venegas G
    J Reprod Med; 2015; 60(1-2):43-7. PubMed ID: 25745750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Pain evaluation in office hysteroscopy: comparison of two techniques].
    Diniz DB; Depes Dde B; Pereira AM; David SD; Lippi UG; Baracat FF; Lopes RG
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jan; 32(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 20209259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endometriosis presenting as vaginal polyps: outpatient vaginoscopic treatment.
    Tanvir T; Meeta M; Rane A; Singh A; Masood J
    Fertil Steril; 2021 May; 115(5):1353-1355. PubMed ID: 33589138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient satisfaction with outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy: randomised controlled trial.
    Kremer C; Duffy S; Moroney M
    BMJ; 2000 Jan; 320(7230):279-82. PubMed ID: 10650023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy more useful than endometrial biopsy alone for the investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding in unselected premenopausal women? A randomised comparison.
    Bain C; Parkin DE; Cooper KG
    BJOG; 2002 Jul; 109(7):805-11. PubMed ID: 12135218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised comparison of vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy and saline infusion sonography: a patient compliance study.
    van Dongen H; de Kroon CD; van den Tillaart SA; Louwé LA; Trimbos-Kemper GC; Jansen FW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1232-7. PubMed ID: 18715407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virtual reality for acute pain in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Deo N; Khan KS; Mak J; Allotey J; Gonzalez Carreras FJ; Fusari G; Benn J
    BJOG; 2021 Jan; 128(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 32575151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misoprostol for cervical priming prior to hysteroscopy in postmenopausal and premenopausal nulliparous women; a multicentre randomised placebo controlled trial.
    Tasma ML; Louwerse MD; Hehenkamp WJ; Geomini PM; Bongers MY; Veersema S; van Kesteren PJ; Tromp E; Huirne JA; Graziosi GC
    BJOG; 2018 Jan; 125(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 28109045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. State-of-the-art flexible hysteroscopy for office gynecologic evaluation.
    Bradley LD; Widrich T
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 May; 2(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 9050568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Invisible External Cervical Os. Tips and Tricks to Overcome this Challenge during In-Office Hysteroscopy.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A; Giampaolino P; Manzi A; De Angelis MC; Zizolfi B; Alonso L; Carugno J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):172-173. PubMed ID: 32526381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does cervical preparation before outpatient hysteroscopy reduce women's pain experience? A systematic review.
    Cooper NA; Smith P; Khan KS; Clark TJ
    BJOG; 2011 Oct; 118(11):1292-301. PubMed ID: 21797959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy.
    Paschopoulos M; Paraskevaidis E; Stefanidis K; Kofinas G; Lolis D
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1997 Aug; 4(4):465-7. PubMed ID: 9224581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of altering filling pressures in diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy on the procedure completion rates and associated pain: a randomised double-blind controlled trial.
    Haggag HM; Hassan AM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Feb; 56(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 26440297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized study of vaginoscopy and H Pipelle vs traditional hysteroscopy and standard Pipelle.
    Ngu SF; Cheung VY; Pun TC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 22265052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.