These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30802078)

  • 1. Independent recollection-familiarity ratings: Similar effects of levels-of-processing whether amount or confidence is rated.
    Williams HL; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):94-99. PubMed ID: 30802078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Independent recollection/familiarity ratings can dissociate: Evidence from the effects of test context on recognition of event details.
    Willems S; Schroyen S; Dehon H; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):100-104. PubMed ID: 30802076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing recollection and nonrecollection memory states for recall of general knowledge: A nontrivial pursuit.
    Pereverseff RS; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2207-2225. PubMed ID: 32658545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
    Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Familiarity, but not recollection, supports the between-subject production effect in recognition memory.
    Fawcett JM; Ozubko JD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):99-115. PubMed ID: 27244352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
    Siedlecka M; Skóra Z; Paulewicz B; Fijałkowska S; Timmermans B; Wierzchoń M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 29999396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Source retrieval under cueing: Dissociated effects on accuracy versus confidence.
    Jaeger A; Queiroz MC; Selmeczy D; Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1477-1493. PubMed ID: 32105146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impaired capacity for familiarity after hippocampal damage.
    Song Z; Wixted JT; Hopkins RO; Squire LR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jun; 108(23):9655-60. PubMed ID: 21606344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amount, not strength of recollection, drives hippocampal activity: A problem for apparent word familiarity-related hippocampal activation.
    Mayes AR; Montaldi D; Roper A; Migo EM; Gholipour T; Kafkas A
    Hippocampus; 2019 Jan; 29(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 30411437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.
    Evans LH; Wilding EL
    J Neurosci; 2012 May; 32(21):7253-7. PubMed ID: 22623670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is all metamemory monitoring spared from aging? A dual-process examination.
    Kuhlmann BG; Undorf M
    Psychol Aging; 2018 Dec; 33(8):1152-1167. PubMed ID: 30550332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.
    Ingram KM; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):325-39. PubMed ID: 21967320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.
    Ramey MM; Henderson JM; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Nov; 149(11):2046-2062. PubMed ID: 32250136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing recollection and familiarity of similar lures in a behavioral pattern separation task.
    Kim J; Yassa MA
    Hippocampus; 2013 Apr; 23(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 23401187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test context affects recollection and familiarity ratings: implications for measuring recognition experiences.
    Tousignant C; Bodner GE
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):994-1000. PubMed ID: 22309813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavioural pattern separation is strongly associated with familiarity-based decisions.
    Szőllősi Á; Bencze D; Racsmány M
    Memory; 2020 Mar; 28(3):337-347. PubMed ID: 31955670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity in the striatum and hippocampus: Across-study convergence.
    King DR; Chastelaine M; Elward RL; Wang TH; Rugg MD
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 354():1-7. PubMed ID: 28803854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical tests of the continuous dual-process model of recognition.
    Cha J; Dobbins IG
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104827. PubMed ID: 34229131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of context on recollection and familiarity experiences are task dependent.
    Tousignant C; Bodner GE; Arnold MM
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 May; 33():78-89. PubMed ID: 25543993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effects of initial familiarity and source recollection on confidence ratings of recognition memory].
    Yano M; Itoh Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Oct; 75(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15747552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.