These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30802096)

  • 1. Wise up: Clarifying the role of metacognition in the Dunning-Kruger effect.
    McIntosh RD; Fowler EA; Lyu T; Della Sala S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Nov; 148(11):1882-1897. PubMed ID: 30802096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skill and self-knowledge: empirical refutation of the dual-burden account of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
    McIntosh RD; Moore AB; Liu Y; Della Sala S
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Dec; 9(12):191727. PubMed ID: 36483762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making.
    Wokke ME; Cleeremans A; Ridderinkhof KR
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 28123015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dunning-Kruger effects in face perception.
    Zhou X; Jenkins R
    Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104345. PubMed ID: 32531378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No strong support for a Dunning-Kruger effect in creativity: analyses of self-assessment in absolute and relative terms.
    Lebuda I; Hofer G; Rominger C; Benedek M
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11883. PubMed ID: 38789493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metacognitive knowledge and experience in recently diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder.
    Torres IJ; Mackala SA; Kozicky JM; Yatham LN
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Sep; 38(7):730-44. PubMed ID: 27144722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A rational model of the Dunning-Kruger effect supports insensitivity to evidence in low performers.
    Jansen RA; Rafferty AN; Griffiths TL
    Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 5(6):756-763. PubMed ID: 33633375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing metacognition during or after basic-level and high-level cognitive tasks? A comparative study in a non-clinical sample.
    Quiles C; Prouteau A; Verdoux H
    Encephale; 2020 Feb; 46(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 31227210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: how perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons.
    Burson KA; Larrick RP; Klayman J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):60-77. PubMed ID: 16448310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks.
    Mazancieux A; Fleming SM; Souchay C; Moulin CJA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1788-1799. PubMed ID: 32191079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
    Muller A; Sirianni LA; Addante RJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 53(2):460-484. PubMed ID: 32761954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Avoiding the conflict: Metacognitive awareness drives the selection of low-demand contexts.
    Desender K; Buc Calderon C; Van Opstal F; Van den Bussche E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1397-1410. PubMed ID: 28368164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Domain-general enhancements of metacognitive ability through adaptive training.
    Carpenter J; Sherman MT; Kievit RA; Seth AK; Lau H; Fleming SM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 30596440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linking metacognition and mindreading: Evidence from autism and dual-task investigations.
    Nicholson T; Williams DM; Lind SE; Grainger C; Carruthers P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):206-220. PubMed ID: 32915016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judging the subjective difficulty of different kinds of tasks.
    Feghhi I; Rosenbaum DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):983-994. PubMed ID: 30985177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The temporal dynamics of metacognition: Dissociating task-related activity from later metacognitive processes.
    Desender K; Van Opstal F; Hughes G; Van den Bussche E
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Feb; 82():54-64. PubMed ID: 26777465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A motor task, not working memory, causes the revelation effect.
    Miura H; Itoh Y
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2024 Jun; 78(2):81-87. PubMed ID: 37917423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metacognitive processing in language learning tasks is affected by bilingualism.
    Ordin M; Polyanskaya L; Soto D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):529-538. PubMed ID: 31282726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metacognition and Reading: Comparing Three Forms of Metacognition in Normally Developing Readers and Readers with Dyslexia.
    Furnes B; Norman E
    Dyslexia; 2015 Aug; 21(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26234622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.