These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30802404)

  • 1. Chemically Accurate 0-0 Energies with Not-so-Accurate Excited State Geometries.
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2481-2491. PubMed ID: 30802404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is the Key for Accurate Absorption and Emission Calculations, Energy or Geometry?
    Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Mar; 14(3):1534-1543. PubMed ID: 29365256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Reference Energies and Benchmarks.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Blondel A; Garniron Y; Caffarel M; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Aug; 14(8):4360-4379. PubMed ID: 29966098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-Comparisons between Experiment, TD-DFT, CC, and ADC for Transition Energies.
    Suellen C; Freitas RG; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Aug; 15(8):4581-4590. PubMed ID: 31265781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmarks for Electronically Excited States: A Comparison of Noniterative and Iterative Triples Corrections in Linear Response Coupled Cluster Methods: CCSDR(3) versus CC3.
    Sauer SP; Schreiber M; Silva-Junior MR; Thiel W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Mar; 5(3):555-64. PubMed ID: 26610222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations.
    Loos PF; Comin M; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jun; 17(6):3666-3686. PubMed ID: 33955742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarking Coupled Cluster Methods on Valence Singlet Excited States.
    Kánnár D; Szalay PG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Sep; 10(9):3757-65. PubMed ID: 26588520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmarking TD-DFT and Wave Function Methods for Oscillator Strengths and Excited-State Dipole Moments.
    Sarkar R; Boggio-Pasqua M; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Feb; 17(2):1117-1132. PubMed ID: 33492950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Medium Sized Molecules.
    Loos PF; Lipparini F; Boggio-Pasqua M; Scemama A; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1711-1741. PubMed ID: 31986042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3.
    Schreiber M; Silva-Junior MR; Sauer SP; Thiel W
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Apr; 128(13):134110. PubMed ID: 18397056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods to low-lying singlet and triplet electronic states of HBO and BOH.
    DeYonker NJ; Li S; Yamaguchi Y; Schaefer HF; Crawford TD; King RA; Peterson KA
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Jun; 122(23):234316. PubMed ID: 16008450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarking coupled cluster methods on singlet excited states of nucleobases.
    Kánnár D; Szalay PG
    J Mol Model; 2014 Nov; 20(11):2503. PubMed ID: 25394400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why do TD-DFT excitation energies of BODIPY/Aza-BODIPY families largely deviate from experiment? Answers from electron correlated and multireference methods.
    Momeni MR; Brown A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2619-32. PubMed ID: 26575559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of singlet ground and low-lying electronic excited states of phosphaethyne and isophosphaethyne.
    Ingels JB; Turney JM; Richardson NA; Yamaguchi Y; Schaefer HF
    J Chem Phys; 2006 Sep; 125(10):104306. PubMed ID: 16999525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theoretical 0-0 Energies with Chemical Accuracy.
    Loos PF; Galland N; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2018 Aug; 9(16):4646-4651. PubMed ID: 30063359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Bicyclic Systems.
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem A; 2021 Dec; 125(47):10174-10188. PubMed ID: 34792354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coupled cluster and density functional studies on geometries and energies of excited C(2v) states of ozone.
    Grein F
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Mar; 130(12):124118. PubMed ID: 19334819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmark of Bethe-Salpeter for Triplet Excited-States.
    Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blondel A; Blase X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Feb; 13(2):767-783. PubMed ID: 28107000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurate Excited-State Geometries: A CASPT2 and Coupled-Cluster Reference Database for Small Molecules.
    Budzák Š; Scalmani G; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Dec; 13(12):6237-6252. PubMed ID: 29140697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calculations of n→π* Transition Energies: Comparisons Between TD-DFT, ADC, CC, CASPT2, and BSE/GW Descriptions.
    Azarias C; Habert C; Budzák Š; Blase X; Duchemin I; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem A; 2017 Aug; 121(32):6122-6134. PubMed ID: 28738157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.