344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30802972)
1. Radiomics robustness assessment and classification evaluation: A two-stage method demonstrated on multivendor FFDM.
Robinson K; Li H; Lan L; Schacht D; Giger M
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2145-2156. PubMed ID: 30802972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification.
Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Wang XH; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1234-41. PubMed ID: 20619697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer: Additive Value of Radiomics of Breast Parenchyma.
Li H; Mendel KR; Lan L; Sheth D; Giger ML
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 30747591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.
Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features.
Sakai A; Onishi Y; Matsui M; Adachi H; Teramoto A; Saito K; Fujita H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 31686300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI.
Yuan Y; Giger ML; Li H; Bhooshan N; Sennett CA
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1158-67. PubMed ID: 20692620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of global and local region-based bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry to predict short-term breast cancer risk.
Li Y; Fan M; Cheng H; Zhang P; Zheng B; Li L
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025004. PubMed ID: 29226849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography.
Cole EB; Toledano AY; Lundqvist M; Pisano ED
Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22. PubMed ID: 22537503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.
Wei J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2827-38. PubMed ID: 16266097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mass type-specific sparse representation for mass classification in computer-aided detection on mammograms.
Kim DH; Lee SH; Ro YM
Biomed Eng Online; 2013; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 24564973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison study of image features between FFDM and film mammogram images.
Jing H; Yang Y; Wernick MN; Yarusso LM; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4386-94. PubMed ID: 22830771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
