These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30803011)

  • 1. Noise, Economy, and the Emergence of Information Structure in a Laboratory Language.
    Stevens JS; Roberts G
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 43(2):e12717. PubMed ID: 30803011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phonology competes with syntax: experimental evidence for the interaction of word order and accent placement in the realization of Information Structure.
    Keller F; Alexopoulou T
    Cognition; 2001 May; 79(3):301-72. PubMed ID: 11165215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternative Solutions to a Language Design Problem: The Role of Adjectives and Gender Marking in Efficient Communication.
    Dye M; Milin P; Futrell R; Ramscar M
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 10(1):209-224. PubMed ID: 29218788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation.
    Gibson E; Bergen L; Piantadosi ST
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 May; 110(20):8051-6. PubMed ID: 23637344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acquisition of prosodic focus marking by English, French, and German three-, four-, five- and six-year-olds.
    Szendrői K; Bernard C; Berger F; Gervain J; Höhle B
    J Child Lang; 2018 Jan; 45(1):219-241. PubMed ID: 28462765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.
    Aylett M; Turk A
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 1):31-56. PubMed ID: 15298329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An experimental approach to linguistic representation.
    Branigan HP; Pickering MJ
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e282. PubMed ID: 27894378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preschoolers Flexibly Adapt to Linguistic Input in a Noisy Channel.
    Yurovsky D; Case S; Frank MC
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Jan; 28(1):132-140. PubMed ID: 28078978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interaction of visual and linguistic saliency during syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Coco MI; Keller F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):46-74. PubMed ID: 25176109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iconicity affects children's comprehension of complex sentences: The role of semantics, clause order, input and individual differences.
    de Ruiter LE; Theakston AL; Brandt S; Lieven EVM
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():202-224. PubMed ID: 29197241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spoken language comprehension of phrases, simple and compound-active sentences in non-speaking children with severe cerebral palsy.
    Geytenbeek JJ; Heim MJ; Knol DL; Vermeulen RJ; Oostrom KJ
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2015 Jul; 50(4):499-515. PubMed ID: 25703269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing.
    Dominey PF; Inui T; Hoen M
    Brain Lang; 2009; 109(2-3):80-92. PubMed ID: 18835637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language learning experience and mastering the challenges of perceiving speech in noise.
    Kousaie S; Baum S; Phillips NA; Gracco V; Titone D; Chen JK; Chai XJ; Klein D
    Brain Lang; 2019 Sep; 196():104645. PubMed ID: 31284145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neural integration of speaker and message.
    Van Berkum JJ; van den Brink D; Tesink CM; Kos M; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):580-91. PubMed ID: 18052777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compositional structure can emerge without generational transmission.
    Raviv L; Meyer A; Lev-Ari S
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():151-164. PubMed ID: 30267952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences with a differing number of arguments: a comparison of English and Japanese speakers.
    Nagata H; Bain B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Oct; 91(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 11065310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sentence interpretation in normal and aphasic Hindi speakers.
    Vaid J; Pandit R
    Brain Lang; 1991 Aug; 41(2):250-74. PubMed ID: 1718532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure.
    Kirby S; Tamariz M; Cornish H; Smith K
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():87-102. PubMed ID: 25966840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's comprehension of grammatical structures in context.
    Gourley JW; Catlin J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1978 Nov; 7(6):419-34. PubMed ID: 745156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.