502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30803407)
1. Comparative preclinical evaluation of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries.
Sperling C; Waliszewski MW; Kherad B; Krackhardt F
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2019; 13():1753944719826335. PubMed ID: 30803407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparable vascular response of a new generation sirolimus eluting stents when compared to fluoropolymer everolimus eluting stents in the porcine coronary restenosis model.
Buszman PP; Michalak MJ; Pruski M; Fernandez C; Jelonek M; Janas A; Savard C; Gwiazdowska-Nowotka B; Żurakowski A; Wojakowski W; Buszman PE; Milewski K
Cardiol J; 2016; 23(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 27976797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries).
Ormiston J; Webster M; Stewart J; Vrolix M; Whitbourn R; Donohoe D; Knape C; Lansky A; Attizzani GF; Fitzgerald P; Kandzari DE; Wijns W
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1026-34. PubMed ID: 24055443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental evaluation of efficacy and healing response of everolimus-eluting stents in the familial hypercholesterolemic swine model: a comparative study of bioabsorbable versus durable polymer stent platforms.
Tellez A; Seifert PS; Donskoy E; Sushkova N; Pennington DE; Milewski K; Krueger CG; Kaluza GL; Eppihimer MJ; Huibregtse BA; Dawkins KD; Granada JF
Coron Artery Dis; 2014 May; 25(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 24642807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Polymer-free biolimus a9-coated stent demonstrates more sustained intimal inhibition, improved healing, and reduced inflammation compared with a polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting cypher stent in a porcine model.
Tada N; Virmani R; Grant G; Bartlett L; Black A; Clavijo C; Christians U; Betts R; Savage D; Su SH; Shulze J; Kar S
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Apr; 3(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 20407114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vascular response and mechanical integrity of the new biodegradable polymer coated sirolimus-eluting PROLIM stent implanted in porcine coronary arteries.
Milewski K; Gorycki B; Buszman PP; Jelonek M; Beaudry D; Lapointe JM; Guy LG; Abusamra M; Pająk J; Kinasz W; Wojakowski W; Leclerc G; Gil RJ; Buszman PE
Kardiol Pol; 2012; 70(7):703-11. PubMed ID: 22825946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of bioresorbable versus permanent polymer on longterm vessel wall inflammation and healing: a comparative drug-eluting stent experimental study.
Wilson GJ; McGregor J; Conditt G; Shibuya M; Sushkova N; Eppihimer MJ; Hawley SP; Rouselle SD; Huibregtse BA; Dawkins KD; Granada JF
EuroIntervention; 2018 Feb; 13(14):1670-1679. PubMed ID: 28846542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Propensity score matched all comers population treated with ultra-thin strut bare metal and sirolimus-probucol coated drug-eluting stents of identical stent architecture.
Krackhardt F; Rosli MA; Leschke M; Schneider A; Sperling C; Heang TM; Pons M; Sousa PJ; Kherad B; Waliszewski M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1221-1228. PubMed ID: 28944613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons of early vascular reactions in biodegradable and durable polymer-based drug-eluting stents in the porcine coronary artery.
Ijichi T; Nakazawa G; Torii S; Nagamatsu H; Yoshikawa A; Souba J; Isobe A; Hagiwara H; Ikari Y
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209841. PubMed ID: 30629613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents: is the paradigm shifting?
Palmerini T; Biondi-Zoccai G; Della Riva D; Mariani A; Genereux P; Branzi A; Stone GW
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Nov; 62(21):1915-1921. PubMed ID: 24036025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized Multicenter Trial Investigating Angiographic Outcomes of Hybrid Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Compared With Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Chronic Total Occlusions: The PRISON IV Trial.
Teeuwen K; van der Schaaf RJ; Adriaenssens T; Koolen JJ; Smits PC; Henriques JP; Vermeersch PH; Tjon Joe Gin RM; Schölzel BE; Kelder JC; Tijssen JG; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jan; 10(2):133-143. PubMed ID: 28104206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the vessel healing process after everolimus-eluting stent and bare metal stent implantations in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Yano H; Horinaka S; Watahik M; Watanabe T; Ishimitsu T
Heart Vessels; 2019 Apr; 34(4):572-582. PubMed ID: 30392104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel polymer-free paclitaxel-eluting stent with a nanoporous surface for rapid endothelialization and inhibition of intimal hyperplasia: Comparison with a polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent and bare metal stent in a porcine model.
Jia H; Liu H; Kong J; Hou J; Wu J; Zhang M; Tian J; Liu H; Ma L; Hu S; Huang X; Zhang S; Zhang S; Yu B; Jang IK
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2011 Sep; 98(4):629-37. PubMed ID: 21732525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of an asymmetrical coating stent with sirolimus released from ablumial matrix in porcine model.
Shen L; Wu Y; Zhang F; Wu L; Dong C; Gao Y; Sun A; Zou Y; Qian J; Sun J; Zhong W; Ge J
Clin Res Cardiol; 2012 Nov; 101(11):917-27. PubMed ID: 22627890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of neointimal coverage and extra-stent lumen between sirolimus and everolimus-eluting stent using optical coherence tomography.
Oda T; Okamura T; Yamada J; Miyagi N; Uehara H; Nao T; Tateishi H; Maeda T; Nakamura T; Shiraishi K; Nakashima T; Nishimura S; Miura T; Matsuzaki M; Yano M
Heart Vessels; 2016 Apr; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 25614415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Endothelial Barrier Functional Recovery After Implantation of a Novel Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Comparison to Durable- and Biodegradable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
Sakamoto A; Torii S; Jinnouchi H; Guo L; Cornelissen A; Kuntz S; Cheng Q; Fernandez R; Paek KH; Harris K; Srivastava MC; Kolodgie FD; Virmani R; Finn AV
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2021 Mar; 24():1-10. PubMed ID: 32928693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of sirolimus eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer to everolimus eluting stent with permanent polymer in bifurcation lesions: Results from CENTURY II trial.
Orvin K; Carrie D; Richardt G; Desmet W; Assali A; Werner G; Ikari Y; Fujii K; Goicolea J; Dangoisse V; Manari A; Saito S; Wijns W; Kornowski R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 87(6):1092-100. PubMed ID: 26268482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endothelial Barrier Protein Expression in Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents.
Mori H; Cheng Q; Lutter C; Smith S; Guo L; Kutyna M; Torii S; Harari E; Acampado E; Joner M; Kolodgie FD; Virmani R; Finn AV
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(23):2375-2387. PubMed ID: 29102583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histopathological comparison of biodegradable polymer and permanent polymer based sirolimus eluting stents in a porcine model of coronary stent implantation.
Koppara T; Joner M; Bayer G; Steigerwald K; Diener T; Wittchow E
Thromb Haemost; 2012 Jun; 107(6):1161-71. PubMed ID: 22535188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
