These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30804046)

  • 1. Baseline selection on a collider: a ubiquitous mechanism occurring in both representative and selected cohort studies.
    Richiardi L; Pearce N; Pagano E; Di Cuonzo D; Zugna D; Pizzi C
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2019 May; 73(5):475-480. PubMed ID: 30804046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations.
    Munafò MR; Tilling K; Taylor AE; Evans DM; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 47(1):226-235. PubMed ID: 29040562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias.
    Lu H; Gonsalves GS; Westreich D
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 193(3):407-409. PubMed ID: 37939152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider.
    Cole SR; Platt RW; Schisterman EF; Chu H; Westreich D; Richardson D; Poole C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 39(2):417-20. PubMed ID: 19926667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
    Liu W; Brookhart MA; Schneeweiss S; Mi X; Setoguchi S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 176(10):938-48. PubMed ID: 23100247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Healthcare utilization is a collider: an introduction to collider bias in EHR data reuse.
    Weiskopf NG; Dorr DA; Jackson C; Lehmann HP; Thompson CA
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2023 Apr; 30(5):971-977. PubMed ID: 36752649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating selection bias in a population-based cohort study with low baseline participation: the LIFE-Adult-Study.
    Enzenbach C; Wicklein B; Wirkner K; Loeffler M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):135. PubMed ID: 31262266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies.
    Nohr EA; Liew Z
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):407-416. PubMed ID: 29415329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection bias and patterns of confounding in cohort studies: the case of the NINFEA web-based birth cohort.
    Pizzi C; De Stavola BL; Pearce N; Lazzarato F; Ghiotti P; Merletti F; Richiardi L
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2012 Nov; 66(11):976-81. PubMed ID: 22147750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Selection effects in epidemiological cohorts: nature, causes and consequences].
    Goldberg M; Luce D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2001 Oct; 49(5):477-92. PubMed ID: 11845097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biased Exposure-Health Effect Estimates from Selection in Cohort Studies: Are Environmental Studies at Particular Risk?
    Weisskopf MG; Sparrow D; Hu H; Power MC
    Environ Health Perspect; 2015 Nov; 123(11):1113-22. PubMed ID: 25956004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A structural approach to selection bias.
    Hernán MA; Hernández-Díaz S; Robins JM
    Epidemiology; 2004 Sep; 15(5):615-25. PubMed ID: 15308962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Inequalities in health in Italy].
    Caiazzo A; Cardano M; Cois E; Costa G; Marinacci C; Spadea T; Vannoni F; Venturini L
    Epidemiol Prev; 2004; 28(3 Suppl):i-ix, 1-161. PubMed ID: 15537046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glucosamine and lower mortality and cancer incidence: Selection bias in the observational studies.
    Suissa K; Hudson M; Suissa S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2022 Dec; 31(12):1272-1279. PubMed ID: 36029480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-selection and bias in a large prospective pregnancy cohort in Norway.
    Nilsen RM; Vollset SE; Gjessing HK; Skjaerven R; Melve KK; Schreuder P; Alsaker ER; Haug K; Daltveit AK; Magnus P
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 23(6):597-608. PubMed ID: 19840297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies.
    Biele G; Gustavson K; Czajkowski NO; Nilsen RM; Reichborn-Kjennerud T; Magnus PM; Stoltenberg C; Aase H
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 34(10):927-938. PubMed ID: 31451995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for biases in survey-based estimates of population attributable fractions.
    Masters R; Reither E
    Popul Health Metr; 2019 Dec; 17(1):19. PubMed ID: 31830997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reflection on modern methods: selection bias-a review of recent developments.
    Infante-Rivard C; Cusson A
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 47(5):1714-1722. PubMed ID: 29982600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection Bias with Outcome-dependent Sampling.
    Sjölander A
    Epidemiology; 2023 Mar; 34(2):186-191. PubMed ID: 36722800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive health indicators and fetal medicine - many things will change.
    Olsen J; Pedersen LH
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2016 Jun; 42(6):561-562. PubMed ID: 27685865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.