3256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30806019)
1. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of the PRISMA statement to improve the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions for patients with heart failure.
Liu H; Zhou X; Yu G; Sun X
Int J Nurs Pract; 2019 Jun; 25(3):e12729. PubMed ID: 30790391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A systematic review.
Sun X; Wang D; Wang M; Li H; Liu B
Nurs Open; 2021 May; 8(3):1489-1500. PubMed ID: 33465288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
Ross A; Rankin J; Beaman J; Murray K; Sinnett P; Riddle R; Haskins J; Vassar M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181927. PubMed ID: 28771633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis.
Liu D; Jin J; Tian J; Yang K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0120911. PubMed ID: 25905713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM
Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.
Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J
Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
Ge L; Tian JH; Li YN; Pan JX; Li G; Wei D; Xing X; Pan B; Chen YL; Song FJ; Yang KH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():45-55. PubMed ID: 29111471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines.
Ndze VN; Jaca A; Wiysonge CS
Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(12):2836-2843. PubMed ID: 31166843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses of acupuncture for patients with migraine: A methodological investigation with evidence map.
Lu TT; Lu CC; Li MX; Ke LX; Cai H; Yang KH
J Integr Med; 2022 May; 20(3):213-220. PubMed ID: 35232686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Topics and PRISMA Checklist Compliance for Meta-analyses in Dermatology: Journal Case Study.
Poveda-Montoyo I; Belinchón-Romero I; Romero-Pérez D; Ramos-Rincón JM
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2019 Dec; 27(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 31969243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
Gao Y; Ge L; Ma X; Shen X; Liu M; Tian J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():214-227. PubMed ID: 31150834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of network meta-analyses in anesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-epidemiological study.
Sehmbi H; Retter S; Shah UJ; Nguyen D; Martin J; Uppal V
Can J Anaesth; 2023 Sep; 70(9):1461-1473. PubMed ID: 37420161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built?
O'Kelly F; DeCotiis K; Aditya I; Braga LH; Koyle MA
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Apr; 16(2):207-217. PubMed ID: 31917158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
