These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30806197)

  • 1. An assessment of the readability of online material related to fluoride.
    Basch CH; Ethan D; Cadorett V; Kollia B; Clark A
    J Prev Interv Community; 2019; 47(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 30806197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
    Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
    Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.
    Weiss KD; Vargas CR; Ho OA; Chuang DJ; Weiss J; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 27916381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability of online material related to skin cancer.
    Basch CH; Fera J; Ethan D; Garcia P; Perin D; Basch CE
    Public Health; 2018 Oct; 163():137-140. PubMed ID: 30149263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Basch CH; Ethan D; MacLean SA; Fera J; Garcia P; Basch CE
    Am J Mens Health; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1665-1669. PubMed ID: 29888641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
    Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the readability of online foot and ankle patient education materials.
    Sheppard ED; Hyde Z; Florence MN; McGwin G; Kirchner JS; Ponce BA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1282-6. PubMed ID: 25239196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders.
    Dueppen AJ; Bellon-Harn ML; Radhakrishnan N; Manchaiah V
    J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 29254598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Readability of Online Resources for Mastopexy Surgery.
    Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 77(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 25536208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
    Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.
    Brigo F; Otte WM; Igwe SC; Tezzon F; Nardone R
    Epilepsy Behav; 2015 Mar; 44():35-9. PubMed ID: 25601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Water fluoridation and the quality of information available online.
    Frangos Z; Steffens M; Leask J
    Int Dent J; 2018 Aug; 68(4):253-261. PubMed ID: 29441567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability and quality assessment of websites related to microtia and aural atresia.
    Alamoudi U; Hong P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 79(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 25554575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
    Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.
    Vargas CR; Ricci JA; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Mar; 76(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 25695442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Easier the Better? Comparing the Readability and Engagement of Online Pro- and Anti-Vaccination Articles.
    Xu Z; Ellis L; Umphrey LR
    Health Educ Behav; 2019 Oct; 46(5):790-797. PubMed ID: 31216882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability of Spanish language online information for the initial treatment of burns.
    Votta K; Metivier M; Romo S; Garrigan H; Drexler A; Nodoushani A; Sheridan R
    Burns; 2018 Jun; 44(4):956-961. PubMed ID: 29402576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Systematic analysis of the readability of patient information on the websites of clinics for plastic surgery].
    Esfahani BJ; Faron A; Roth KS; Schaller HE; Medved F; Lüers JC
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Dec; 46(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 25412241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.