These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30806197)

  • 21. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.
    Prabhu AV; Kim C; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; DeFrances MC; Trejo Bittar HE
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jul; 65():15-20. PubMed ID: 28504209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.
    McInnes N; Haglund BJ
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Dec; 36(4):173-89. PubMed ID: 21332302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.
    Beutel BG; Danna NR; Melamed E; Capo JT
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 26630468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
    San Giorgi MRM; de Groot OSD; Dikkers FG
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Oct; 127(10):2293-2297. PubMed ID: 28233911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Arthroscopy-Related Online Patient Education Materials.
    Akinleye SD; Krochak R; Richardson N; Garofolo G; Culbertson MD; Erez O
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Apr; 34(4):1272-1279. PubMed ID: 29287948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis.
    Kocyigit BF; Koca TT; Akaltun MS
    Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Nov; 38(11):3269-3274. PubMed ID: 31372852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Readability of consumer health information on the internet: a comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites.
    Risoldi Cochrane Z; Gregory P; Wilson A
    J Health Commun; 2012; 17(9):1003-10. PubMed ID: 22512714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Readability of Online Information Related to Pediatric Radiation Safety From Societal Websites.
    Yi PH; Yi MM; Nguyen JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1128-1134. PubMed ID: 30240293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review.
    Daraz L; Morrow AS; Ponce OJ; Farah W; Katabi A; Majzoub A; Seisa MO; Benkhadra R; Alsawas M; Larry P; Murad MH
    Am J Med Qual; 2018; 33(5):487-492. PubMed ID: 29345143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Readability analysis of online health information about overactive bladder.
    Koo K; Shee K; Yap RL
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Sep; 36(7):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 27794197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Readability, complexity, and suitability analysis of online lymphedema resources.
    Tran BNN; Singh M; Lee BT; Rudd R; Singhal D
    J Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 213():251-260. PubMed ID: 28601323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.
    De Oliveira GS; Jung M; Mccaffery KJ; McCarthy RJ; Wolf MS
    J Clin Anesth; 2015 Aug; 27(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 25912728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.
    Eltorai AE; Sharma P; Wang J; Daniels AH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1181-6. PubMed ID: 25475715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options.
    Ellimoottil C; Polcari A; Kadlec A; Gupta G
    J Urol; 2012 Dec; 188(6):2171-5. PubMed ID: 23083852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Readability Assessment of Online Patient Abdominoplasty Resources.
    Phillips NA; Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Feb; 39(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 25476602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative Readability Analysis of Online Patient Education Resources on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
    Gulati R; Nawaz M; Lam L; Pyrsopoulos NT
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017; 2017():3681989. PubMed ID: 28740843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.