237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30807773)
1. The Accuracy of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation: Impact of the Individual Radiologist and Clinical Factors.
Pickersgill NA; Vetter JM; Raval NS; Andriole GL; Shetty AS; Ippolito JE; Kim EH
Urology; 2019 May; 127():68-73. PubMed ID: 30807773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of the Role of Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Clinical Practice: Is Biopsy Still Necessary?
Wang RS; Kim EH; Vetter JM; Fowler KJ; Shetty AS; Mintz AJ; Badhiwala NG; Grubb RL; Andriole GL
Urology; 2017 Apr; 102():190-197. PubMed ID: 27845218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Aneja S; Syed JS; Pahade J; Mathur M; Sprenkle P; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):W218-W225. PubMed ID: 29489409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Second Opinion May Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies: Time to Improve Radiologists' Training Program?
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Musi G; Catellani M; Alessi S; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Serino A; Conti A; Pricolo P; Nazzani S; Mirone V; Matei DV; Montanari E; de Cobelli O
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Apr; 17(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 30527286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol.
Luzzago S; Musi G; Catellani M; Russo A; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Conti A; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Mirone V; Petralia G; de Cobelli O
Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 29734177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integration and Diagnostic Accuracy of 3T Nonendorectal coil Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Context of Active Surveillance.
Curci NE; Lane BR; Shankar PR; Noyes SL; Moriarity AK; Kubat A; Brede C; Montgomery JS; Auffenberg GB; Miller DC; Montie JE; George AK; Davenport MS
Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():137-143. PubMed ID: 29653121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Krelle M; Gavin D; Koschel S; Aluwihare K; Sutherland T; Skinner S; Brennan J; Wong LM; Louie-Johnsun M
BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 30714285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and Variability of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: A Blinded Comparison of Radiologists.
Pickersgill NA; Vetter JM; Andriole GL; Shetty AS; Fowler KJ; Mintz AJ; Siegel CL; Kim EH
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):267-272. PubMed ID: 30327280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction.
Distler FA; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Schlemmer HP; Wieczorek K; Kirchner M; Pahernik S; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):575-582. PubMed ID: 28373135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer.
Thompson JE; van Leeuwen PJ; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 26529298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
