176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30808018)
1. Uniqueness of poroelastic and viscoelastic nonlinear inversion MR elastography at low frequencies.
McGarry M; Van Houten E; Solamen L; Gordon-Wylie S; Weaver J; Paulsen K
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(7):075006. PubMed ID: 30808018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phantom evaluations of low frequency MR elastography.
Solamen LM; Gordon-Wylie SW; McGarry MD; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065010. PubMed ID: 30695755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Suitability of poroelastic and viscoelastic mechanical models for high and low frequency MR elastography.
McGarry MD; Johnson CL; Sutton BP; Georgiadis JG; Van Houten EE; Pattison AJ; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):947-57. PubMed ID: 25652507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonlinear Inversion MR Elastography With Low-Frequency Actuation.
Zeng W; Gordon-Wylie SW; Tan L; Solamen L; McGarry MDJ; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 May; 39(5):1775-1784. PubMed ID: 31825863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR elastography at 1 Hz of gelatin phantoms using 3D or 4D acquisition.
Gordon-Wylie SW; Solamen LM; McGarry MDJ; Zeng W; VanHouten E; Gilbert G; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
J Magn Reson; 2018 Nov; 296():112-120. PubMed ID: 30241018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the viscoelastic properties of the human brain at 7 T MRI using intrinsic MRE and nonlinear inversion.
Burman Ingeberg M; Van Houten E; Zwanenburg JJM
Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Dec; 44(18):6575-6591. PubMed ID: 37909395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime.
Okamoto RJ; Clayton EH; Bayly PV
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6379-400. PubMed ID: 21908903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brain-mimicking phantom for biomechanical validation of motion sensitive MR imaging techniques.
Ozkaya E; Triolo ER; Rezayaraghi F; Abderezaei J; Meinhold W; Hong K; Alipour A; Kennedy P; Fleysher L; Ueda J; Balchandani P; Eriten M; Johnson CL; Yang Y; Kurt M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Oct; 122():104680. PubMed ID: 34271404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Poroelastic Mechanical Properties of the Brain Tissue of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients During Lumbar Drain Treatment Using Intrinsic Actuation MR Elastography.
Solamen LM; McGarry MDJ; Fried J; Weaver JB; Lollis SS; Paulsen KD
Acad Radiol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):457-466. PubMed ID: 32331966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatially-resolved hydraulic conductivity estimation via poroelastic magnetic resonance elastography.
Pattison AJ; McGarry M; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Jun; 33(6):1373-80. PubMed ID: 24771571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heterogeneous Multifrequency Direct Inversion (HMDI) for magnetic resonance elastography with application to a clinical brain exam.
Barnhill E; Davies PJ; Ariyurek C; Fehlner A; Braun J; Sack I
Med Image Anal; 2018 May; 46():180-188. PubMed ID: 29574398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo wideband multifrequency MR elastography of the human brain and liver.
Dittmann F; Hirsch S; Tzschätzsch H; Guo J; Braun J; Sack I
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1116-26. PubMed ID: 26485494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inversion-recovery MR elastography of the human brain for improved stiffness quantification near fluid-solid boundaries.
Lilaj L; Herthum H; Meyer T; Shahryari M; Bertalan G; Caiazzo A; Braun J; Fischer T; Hirsch S; Sack I
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Nov; 86(5):2552-2561. PubMed ID: 34184306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative 3D magnetic resonance elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis.
Arunachalam SP; Rossman PJ; Arani A; Lake DS; Glaser KJ; Trzasko JD; Manduca A; McGee KP; Ehman RL; Araoz PA
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1184-1192. PubMed ID: 27016276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of wave delivery methodology for brain MRE: Insights from computational simulations.
McGrath DM; Ravikumar N; Beltrachini L; Wilkinson ID; Frangi AF; Taylor ZA
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):341-356. PubMed ID: 27416890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonlinear multiscale regularisation in MR elastography: Towards fine feature mapping.
Barnhill E; Hollis L; Sack I; Braun J; Hoskins PR; Pankaj P; Brown C; van Beek EJR; Roberts N
Med Image Anal; 2017 Jan; 35():133-145. PubMed ID: 27376240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-resolution mechanical imaging of the human brain by three-dimensional multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography at 7T.
Braun J; Guo J; Lützkendorf R; Stadler J; Papazoglou S; Hirsch S; Sack I; Bernarding J
Neuroimage; 2014 Apr; 90():308-14. PubMed ID: 24368262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance elastography of the human brain using a multiphase DENSE acquisition.
Strasser J; Haindl MT; Stollberger R; Fazekas F; Ropele S
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Jun; 81(6):3578-3587. PubMed ID: 30693964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A heterogenous, time harmonic, nearly incompressible transverse isotropic finite element brain simulation platform for MR elastography.
McGarry M; Houten EV; Guertler C; Okamoto R; Smith D; Sowinski D; Johnson C; Bayly P; Weaver J; Paulsen K
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(5):. PubMed ID: 32512548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of a Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography Protocol for the Human Brain.
Kurt M; Wu L; Laksari K; Ozkaya E; Suar ZM; Lv H; Epperson K; Epperson K; Sawyer AM; Camarillo D; Pauly KB; Wintermark M
J Neuroimaging; 2019 Jul; 29(4):440-446. PubMed ID: 31056818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
