176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30808018)
21. Comparison of inversion methods in MR elastography: An open-access pipeline for processing multifrequency shear-wave data and demonstration in a phantom, human kidneys, and brain.
Meyer T; Marticorena Garcia S; Tzschätzsch H; Herthum H; Shahryari M; Stencel L; Braun J; Kalra P; Kolipaka A; Sack I
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Oct; 88(4):1840-1850. PubMed ID: 35691940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A numerical framework for interstitial fluid pressure imaging in poroelastic MRE.
Tan L; McGarry MDJ; Van Houten EEW; Ji M; Solamen L; Zeng W; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178521. PubMed ID: 28586393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vivo, high-frequency three-dimensional cardiac MR elastography: Feasibility in normal volunteers.
Arani A; Glaser KL; Arunachalam SP; Rossman PJ; Lake DS; Trzasko JD; Manduca A; McGee KP; Ehman RL; Araoz PA
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jan; 77(1):351-360. PubMed ID: 26778442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Non-identifiability of the Rayleigh damping material model in magnetic resonance elastography.
Petrov AY; Geoffrey Chase J; Sellier M; Docherty PD
Math Biosci; 2013 Nov; 246(1):191-201. PubMed ID: 24018294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Brain mechanical property measurement using MRE with intrinsic activation.
Weaver JB; Pattison AJ; McGarry MD; Perreard IM; Swienckowski JG; Eskey CJ; Lollis SS; Paulsen KD
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7275-87. PubMed ID: 23079508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mapping heterogenous anisotropic tissue mechanical properties with transverse isotropic nonlinear inversion MR elastography.
McGarry M; Van Houten E; Sowinski D; Jyoti D; Smith DR; Caban-Rivera DA; McIlvain G; Bayly P; Johnson CL; Weaver J; Paulsen K
Med Image Anal; 2022 May; 78():102432. PubMed ID: 35358836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Phantom evaluations of nonlinear inversion MR elastography.
Solamen LM; McGarry MD; Tan L; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145021. PubMed ID: 29877194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modeling of soft poroelastic tissue in time-harmonic MR elastography.
Perriñez PR; Kennedy FE; Van Houten EE; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):598-608. PubMed ID: 19272864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Harmonic wideband simultaneous dual-frequency MR Elastography.
Sango Solanas P; Tse Ve Koon K; Ratiney H; Millioz F; Caussy C; Beuf O
NMR Biomed; 2021 Feb; 34(2):e4442. PubMed ID: 33179393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Separation of fluid and solid shear wave fields and quantification of coupling density by magnetic resonance poroelastography.
Lilaj L; Fischer T; Guo J; Braun J; Sack I; Hirsch S
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Mar; 85(3):1655-1668. PubMed ID: 32902011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Subzone based multi-frequency magnetic resonance elastography using a Rayleigh damped material model.
Petrov A; Chase G; Sellier M; Latta P; Gruwel M; McGarry M; Van Houten E
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():436-9. PubMed ID: 23365922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mechanical analysis of an axially symmetric cylindrical phantom with a spherical heterogeneity for MR elastography.
Schwartz BL; Yin Z; Magin RL
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(18):6821-6832. PubMed ID: 27579850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of viscoelastic property characterization of plastisol phantoms with magnetic resonance elastography and high-frequency rheometry.
Lefebvre PM; Koon KT; Brusseau E; Nicolle S; Palieme JF; Lambert SA; Grenier D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1216-1219. PubMed ID: 28268544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Viscoelasticity of children and adolescent brains through MR elastography.
Ozkaya E; Fabris G; Macruz F; Suar ZM; Abderezaei J; Su B; Laksari K; Wu L; Camarillo DB; Pauly KB; Wintermark M; Kurt M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104229. PubMed ID: 33387852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An automatic differentiation-based gradient method for inversion of the shear wave equation in magnetic resonance elastography: specific application in fibrous soft tissues.
Chatelin S; Charpentier I; Corbin N; Meylheuc L; Vappou J
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(13):5000-19. PubMed ID: 27300107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Scatter-based magnetic resonance elastography.
Papazoglou S; Xu C; Hamhaber U; Siebert E; Bohner G; Klingebiel R; Braun J; Sack I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2229-41. PubMed ID: 19293467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study.
Kishimoto R; Suga M; Koyama A; Omatsu T; Tachibana Y; Ebner DK; Obata T
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e013925. PubMed ID: 28057657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multifrequency inversion in magnetic resonance elastography.
Papazoglou S; Hirsch S; Braun J; Sack I
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(8):2329-46. PubMed ID: 22460134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gradient-Based Optimization for Poroelastic and Viscoelastic MR Elastography.
Tan L; McGarry MD; Van Houten EE; Ji M; Solamen L; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Jan; 36(1):236-250. PubMed ID: 27608454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: A study of feasibility and reproducibility using an ergonomic pillow-like passive driver.
Huang X; Chafi H; Matthews KL; Carmichael O; Li T; Miao Q; Wang S; Jia G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 59():68-76. PubMed ID: 30858002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
