These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30808172)

  • 1. Improved Method of Structure-Based Virtual Screening via Interaction-Energy-Based Learning.
    Yasuo N; Sekijima M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Mar; 59(3):1050-1061. PubMed ID: 30808172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 7. Impact of protein flexibility and water molecules on docking-based virtual screening accuracy.
    Therrien E; Weill N; Tomberg A; Corbeil CR; Lee D; Moitessier N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3198-210. PubMed ID: 25280064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
    Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein-Ligand Empirical Interaction Components for Virtual Screening.
    Yan Y; Wang W; Sun Z; Zhang JZH; Ji C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Aug; 57(8):1793-1806. PubMed ID: 28678484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cosolvent-Based Protein Pharmacophore for Ligand Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
    Arcon JP; Defelipe LA; Lopez ED; Burastero O; Modenutti CP; Barril X; Marti MA; Turjanski AG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3572-3583. PubMed ID: 31373819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Machine Learning Consensus Scoring Improves Performance Across Targets in Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Ericksen SS; Wu H; Zhang H; Michael LA; Newton MA; Hoffmann FM; Wildman SA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jul; 57(7):1579-1590. PubMed ID: 28654262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CRDOCK: an ultrafast multipurpose protein-ligand docking tool.
    Cortés Cabrera Á; Klett J; Dos Santos HG; Perona A; Gil-Redondo R; Francis SM; Priego EM; Gago F; Morreale A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):2300-9. PubMed ID: 22764680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.
    Hsieh JH; Yin S; Wang XS; Liu S; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 22017385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Docking Score ML: Target-Specific Machine Learning Models Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening in 155 Targets.
    Liu H; Hu B; Chen P; Wang X; Wang H; Wang S; Wang J; Lin B; Cheng M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Jul; 64(14):5413-5426. PubMed ID: 38958413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical Model Selection for Prospective Virtual Screening.
    Liu S; Alnammi M; Ericksen SS; Voter AF; Ananiev GE; Keck JL; Hoffmann FM; Wildman SA; Gitter A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):282-293. PubMed ID: 30500183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving structure-based virtual screening performance via learning from scoring function components.
    Xiong GL; Ye WL; Shen C; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32496540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
    Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
    Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FitScore: a fast machine learning-based score for 3D virtual screening enrichment.
    Gehlhaar DK; Mermelstein DJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2024 Aug; 38(1):29. PubMed ID: 39150579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved method of structure-based virtual screening based on ensemble learning.
    Li J; Liu W; Song Y; Xia J
    RSC Adv; 2020 Feb; 10(13):7609-7618. PubMed ID: 35492172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SCORCH: Improving structure-based virtual screening with machine learning classifiers, data augmentation, and uncertainty estimation.
    McGibbon M; Money-Kyrle S; Blay V; Houston DR
    J Adv Res; 2023 Apr; 46():135-147. PubMed ID: 35901959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening Ability by Integrating Multiple Energy Auxiliary Terms from Molecular Docking Scoring.
    Ye WL; Shen C; Xiong GL; Ding JJ; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4216-4230. PubMed ID: 32352294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.