488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30808324)
1. Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies.
Pista A; Costa C; Saldanha C; Moutinho JAF; Moutinho JM; Arrobas F; Catalão C; Kempers J
BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):235. PubMed ID: 30808324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
Simms KT; Hall M; Smith MA; Lew JB; Hughes S; Yuill S; Hammond I; Saville M; Canfell K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0163509. PubMed ID: 28095411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
Tay SK; Lin LE; Goh RC
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of using human papillomavirus 16/18 genotype triage in cervical cancer screening.
Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Goodman KA; Santas CC; Huh WK
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 20713299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation and budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening using cobas 4800 HPV screening technology in the public sector of South Africa.
Dreyer G; Maske C; Stander M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221495. PubMed ID: 31509545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The budget impact of cervical cancer screening using HPV primary screening.
Wright T; Huang J; Baker E; Garfield S; Hertz D; Cox JT
Am J Manag Care; 2016 Mar; 22(3):e95-105. PubMed ID: 26978241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost effectiveness analysis of HPV primary screening and dual stain cytology triage compared with cervical cytology.
Termrungruanglert W; Khemapech N; Tantitamit T; Havanond P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 30(2):e17. PubMed ID: 30740950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of HPV-positive women in cervical screening using results from two consecutive screening rounds.
Polman NJ; Veldhuijzen NJ; Heideman DAM; Snijders PJF; Meijer CJLM; Berkhof J
Int J Cancer; 2019 May; 144(9):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 30565673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with extended HPV genotyping triage for cervical cancer screening: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from nine population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.
Dun C; Yuan M; Zhao X; Hu S; Arbyn M; Zhao F
Cancer Med; 2024 Jun; 13(11):e7316. PubMed ID: 38828559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting.
Poljak M; Oštrbenk A; Seme K; Šterbenc A; Jančar N; Vrtačnik Bokal E
J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S29-S39. PubMed ID: 26643051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Results and cost evaluation of triage with high risk HPV test in cervical cancer screening. A pilot study in Piedmont (North-West Italy)].
Magnani C; Gillio Tos A; De Marco L; Calvia M; Cipelletti A; Bestagini P; Pagano E; Segnan N; Ronco G
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 22706358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 16/18 genotyping in triage of persistent human papillomavirus infections with negative cytology in the English cervical screening pilot.
Rebolj M; Brentnall AR; Mathews C; Denton K; Holbrook M; Levine T; Sargent A; Smith J; Tidy J; Tyler X; Kitchener H;
Br J Cancer; 2019 Sep; 121(6):455-463. PubMed ID: 31409912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PCR-reverse dot blot human papillomavirus genotyping as a primary screening test for cervical cancer in a hospital-based cohort.
Kang Y; Sun P; Mao X; Dong B; Ruan G; Chen L
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e29. PubMed ID: 30887754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
