277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30808425)
1. Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.
Zoltick ES; Linderman MD; McGinniss MA; Ramos E; Ball MP; Church GM; Leonard DGB; Pereira S; McGuire AL; Caskey CT; Sanderson SC; Schadt EE; Nielsen DE; Crawford SD; Green RC;
Genome Med; 2019 Feb; 11(1):10. PubMed ID: 30808425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Personal Genome Sequencing in Ostensibly Healthy Individuals and the PeopleSeq Consortium.
Linderman MD; Nielsen DE; Green RC
J Pers Med; 2016 Mar; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 27023617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.
Sanderson SC; Linderman MD; Suckiel SA; Zinberg R; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Diaz GA; Schadt EE
Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Feb; 25(3):280-292. PubMed ID: 28051073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?
Anderson JA; Meyn MS; Shuman C; Zlotnik Shaul R; Mantella LE; Szego MJ; Bowdin S; Monfared N; Hayeems RZ
J Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 43(8):535-539. PubMed ID: 27888232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Playing a part in research? University students' attitudes to direct-to-consumer genomics.
Vayena E; Ineichen C; Stoupka E; Hafen E
Public Health Genomics; 2014; 17(3):158-68. PubMed ID: 24777115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Personal genomic screening: How best to facilitate preparedness of future clients.
Fleming J; Terrill B; Dziadek M; Kirk EP; Roscioli T; Barlow-Stewart K
Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 31085343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Regier DA; Peacock SJ; Pataky R; van der Hoek K; Jarvik GP; Hoch J; Veenstra D
CMAJ; 2015 Apr; 187(6):E190-E197. PubMed ID: 25754703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parents of a child with epilepsy: Views and expectations on receiving genetic results from Whole Genome Sequencing.
Jaitovich Groisman I; Hurlimann T; Godard B
Epilepsy Behav; 2019 Jan; 90():178-190. PubMed ID: 30583270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project.
Suckiel SA; Linderman MD; Sanderson SC; Diaz GA; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE; Zinberg RE
J Genet Couns; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1044-53. PubMed ID: 26898680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Public interest in whole genome sequencing and information needs: an online survey study.
Etchegary H; Wilson B; Rahman P; Simmonds C; Pullman D
Per Med; 2020 Jul; 17(4):283-293. PubMed ID: 32589098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study.
Pacyna JE; Radecki Breitkopf C; Jenkins SM; Sutton EJ; Horrow C; Kullo IJ; Sharp RR
J Med Genet; 2019 May; 56(5):317-324. PubMed ID: 30580287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Consumer Motivation and Behavior.
Nelson SC; Bowen DJ; Fullerton SM
Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Jul; 105(1):122-131. PubMed ID: 31204012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Web Platform vs In-Person Genetic Counselor for Return of Carrier Results From Exome Sequencing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Biesecker BB; Lewis KL; Umstead KL; Johnston JJ; Turbitt E; Fishler KP; Patton JH; Miller IM; Heidlebaugh AR; Biesecker LG
JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Mar; 178(3):338-346. PubMed ID: 29356820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.
Metcalfe SA; Hickerton C; Savard J; Stackpoole E; Tytherleigh R; Tutty E; Terrill B; Turbitt E; Gray K; Middleton A; Wilson B; Newson AJ; Gaff C
Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):290-299. PubMed ID: 30439534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experiences of early users of direct-to-consumer genomics in Switzerland: an exploratory study.
Vayena E; Gourna E; Streuli J; Hafen E; Prainsack B
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(6):352-62. PubMed ID: 23154382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. After genomic testing results: Parents' long-term views.
Liang NSY; Adam S; Elliott AM; Siemens A; du Souich C; ; ; Friedman JM; Birch P
J Genet Couns; 2022 Feb; 31(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 34165210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
Roberts JS; Gornick MC; Carere DA; Uhlmann WR; Ruffin MT; Green RC
Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 28068660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond medical actionability: Public perceptions of important actions in response to hypothetical genetic testing results.
Seiffert DJ; McCarthy Veach P; LeRoy B; Guan W; Zierhut H
J Genet Couns; 2019 Apr; 28(2):355-366. PubMed ID: 30710467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Canaries in the coal mine: Personal and professional impact of undergoing whole genome sequencing on medical professionals.
Zierhut H; McCarthy Veach P; LeRoy B
Am J Med Genet A; 2015 Nov; 167A(11):2647-56. PubMed ID: 26219924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How Well Do Customers of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing Services Comprehend Genetic Test Results? Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.
Ostergren JE; Gornick MC; Carere DA; Kalia SS; Uhlmann WR; Ruffin MT; Mountain JL; Green RC; Roberts JS;
Public Health Genomics; 2015; 18(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 26087778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
