These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30811451)

  • 1. Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Viguera-Guerra I; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Montilla A; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Gómez-Arias PJ; Vélez García-Nieto A; Gómez-Garcia F; Isla-Tejera B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211919. PubMed ID: 30811451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search.
    Allers K; Hoffmann F; Mathes T; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():102-110. PubMed ID: 29258907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inconsistencies in study eligibility criteria are common between non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their protocols registered in PROSPERO.
    Hu K; Zhao L; Zhou Q; Mei F; Gao Q; Chen F; Jiang M; Zhao B; Zhang W; Kwong JSW; Ma Y; Mou C; Ma B
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 33522101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The fate of urological systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO.
    Khaleel S; Cleveland B; Kalapara A; Sathianathen N; Balaji P; Dahm P
    World J Urol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2981-2986. PubMed ID: 31784773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A descriptive analysis of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014.
    Gates M; Elliott SA; Johnson C; Thomson D; Williams K; Fernandes RM; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):99. PubMed ID: 30285643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols.
    van der Braak K; Ghannad M; Orelio C; Heus P; Damen JAA; Spijker R; Robinson K; Lund H; Hooft L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):191. PubMed ID: 36064610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Global Research Collaboration of Network Meta-Analysis: A Social Network Analysis.
    Li L; Catalá-López F; Alonso-Arroyo A; Tian J; Aleixandre-Benavent R; Pieper D; Ge L; Yao L; Wang Q; Yang K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163239. PubMed ID: 27685998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-date.
    Rombey T; Doni K; Hoffmann F; Pieper D; Allers K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():60-67. PubMed ID: 31589953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Half of systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status.
    Runjic E; Rombey T; Pieper D; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():114-121. PubMed ID: 31476376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer-reviewed articles: an international survey.
    Rombey T; Puljak L; Allers K; Ruano J; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():9-17. PubMed ID: 32201257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols.
    Farrah K; Young K; Tunis MC; Zhao L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):280. PubMed ID: 31730014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsutsumi Y; Kataoka Y; Tsujimoto H; Yamamoto Y; Papola D; Guyatt GH; Fukuhara S; Furukawa TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():25-34. PubMed ID: 31276781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017.
    Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 30866832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting.
    Page MJ; Shamseer L; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 7(1):32. PubMed ID: 29463298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective components of exercise and physical activity-related behaviour-change interventions for chronic non-communicable diseases in Africa: protocol for a systematic mixed studies review with meta-analysis.
    Igwesi-Chidobe CN; Godfrey EL; Kengne AP
    BMJ Open; 2015 Aug; 5(8):e008036. PubMed ID: 26270945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsujimoto H; Kataoka Y; Kimachi M; Shimizu S; Ikenoue T; Fukuma S; Yamamoto Y; Fukuhara S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():54-60. PubMed ID: 28242481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gray literature in systematic reviews on population health in the Middle East and North Africa: protocol of an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping.
    Chaabna K; Cheema S; Abraham A; Alrouh H; Mamtani R; Sheikh JI
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(1):94. PubMed ID: 30021616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolution of appraisal tool usage preferences in PROSPERO records: a study of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Ruano J; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gómez-García F; Parra-Peralbo E; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):294. PubMed ID: 38097923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics of systematic reviews evaluating treatments for COVID-19 registered in PROSPERO.
    Zhang R; Gao Y; Xie D; Lian R; Tian J
    Epidemiol Infect; 2021 Jun; 149():e146. PubMed ID: 34130770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.