132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30811722)
1. Fast quantitative susceptibility reconstruction via total field inversion with improved weighted L
Zhang L; Chen X; Lin J; Ding X; Bao L; Cai C; Li J; Chen Z; Cai S
NMR Biomed; 2019 May; 32(5):e4067. PubMed ID: 30811722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility mapping via improved ℓ
Cai C; Chen X; Liu W; Cai S; Zeng D; Ding X
Comput Biol Med; 2016 Dec; 79():59-67. PubMed ID: 27744181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Liu Z; Kee Y; Zhou D; Wang Y; Spincemaille P
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 27464893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method.
Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiecho complex total field inversion method (mcTFI) for improved signal modeling in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Wen Y; Spincemaille P; Nguyen T; Cho J; Kovanlikaya I; Anderson J; Wu G; Yang B; Fung M; Li K; Kelley D; Benhamo N; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Oct; 86(4):2165-2178. PubMed ID: 34028868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated adaptive preconditioner for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Liu Z; Wen Y; Spincemaille P; Zhang S; Yao Y; Nguyen TD; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jan; 83(1):271-285. PubMed ID: 31402519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid data fidelity term approach for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Lambert M; Tejos C; Langkammer C; Milovic C
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Aug; 88(2):962-972. PubMed ID: 35435267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weak-harmonic regularization for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Milovic C; Bilgic B; Zhao B; Langkammer C; Tejos C; Acosta-Cabronero J
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 30265767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid two-step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors.
Kames C; Wiggermann V; Rauscher A
Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():276-283. PubMed ID: 29138089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-step calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling.
Chen L; Cai S; van Zijl PCM; Li X
NMR Biomed; 2021 Jul; 34(7):e4517. PubMed ID: 33822416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Data-Driven Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using Loss Adaptive Dipole Inversion (LADI).
Kamesh Iyer S; Moon BF; Josselyn N; Ruparel K; Roalf D; Song JW; Guiry S; Ware JB; Kurtz RM; Chawla S; Nabavizadeh SA; Witschey WR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 52(3):823-835. PubMed ID: 32128914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations.
Kee Y; Liu Z; Zhou L; Dimov A; Cho J; de Rochefort L; Seo JK; Wang Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2531-2545. PubMed ID: 28885147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphology-adaptive total variation for the reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility map from the magnetic resonance imaging phase.
Guo L; Mei Y; Guan J; Tan X; Xu Y; Chen W; Feng Q; Feng Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196922. PubMed ID: 29738526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Discussion and improvement methods of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction].
Guo H; Yu Z; Ma G; Li C
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 36(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 31875366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A modulated closed form solution for quantitative susceptibility mapping--a thorough evaluation and comparison to iterative methods based on edge prior knowledge.
Khabipova D; Wiaux Y; Gruetter R; Marques JP
Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():163-174. PubMed ID: 25463463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative susceptibility mapping across two clinical field strengths: Contrast-to-noise ratio enhancement at 1.5T.
Ippoliti M; Adams LC; Winfried B; Hamm B; Spincemaille P; Wang Y; Makowski MR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1410-1420. PubMed ID: 29659131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical Note: Optimization of quantitative susceptibility mapping by streaking artifact detection.
Wu ML; Wang CK; Lin PY; Chao TC
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5715-5722. PubMed ID: 32945538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primal-dual and forward gradient implementation for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Kee Y; Deh K; Dimov A; Spincemaille P; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Dec; 78(6):2416-2427. PubMed ID: 28251685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. QSMxT: Robust masking and artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Stewart AW; Robinson SD; O'Brien K; Jin J; Widhalm G; Hangel G; Walls A; Goodwin J; Eckstein K; Tourell M; Morgan C; Narayanan A; Barth M; Bollmann S
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1289-1300. PubMed ID: 34687073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
