These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30811950)

  • 1. Extending Three Existing Models to Analysis of Trust in Automation: Signal Detection, Statistical Parameter Estimation, and Model-Based Control.
    Sheridan TB
    Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1162-1170. PubMed ID: 30811950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.
    Hoff KA; Bashir M
    Hum Factors; 2015 May; 57(3):407-34. PubMed ID: 25875432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The More You Know: Trust Dynamics and Calibration in Highly Automated Driving and the Effects of Take-Overs, System Malfunction, and System Transparency.
    Kraus J; Scholz D; Stiegemeier D; Baumann M
    Hum Factors; 2020 Aug; 62(5):718-736. PubMed ID: 31233695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influencing Trust for Human-Automation Collaborative Scheduling of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles.
    Clare AS; Cummings ML; Repenning NP
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1208-18. PubMed ID: 26060238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.
    Lee JD; See KA
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(1):50-80. PubMed ID: 15151155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems.
    Schaefer KE; Chen JY; Szalma JL; Hancock PA
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):377-400. PubMed ID: 27005902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM; Ilgen DR
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 18516832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What's Driving Me? Exploration and Validation of a Hierarchical Personality Model for Trust in Automated Driving.
    Kraus J; Scholz D; Baumann M
    Hum Factors; 2021 Sep; 63(6):1076-1105. PubMed ID: 32633564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between automation trust and operator performance for the novice and expert in spacecraft rendezvous and docking (RVD).
    Niu J; Geng H; Zhang Y; Du X
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Sep; 71():1-8. PubMed ID: 29764609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why Do I Have to Drive Now? Post Hoc Explanations of Takeover Requests.
    Körber M; Prasch L; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):305-323. PubMed ID: 29283269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation.
    Parasuraman R; Sheridan TB; Wickens CD
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum; 2000 May; 30(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11760769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Role of Trust as a Mediator Between System Characteristics and Response Behaviors.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Proaps AB; Madhavan P
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):947-58. PubMed ID: 25917611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trust Mediating Reliability-Reliance Relationship in Supervisory Control of Human-Swarm Interactions.
    Hussein A; Elsawah S; Abbass HA
    Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1237-1248. PubMed ID: 31590574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration.
    Parasuraman R; Manzey DH
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):381-410. PubMed ID: 21077562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive Cognitive Mechanisms to Maintain Calibrated Trust and Reliance in Automation.
    Lebiere C; Blaha LM; Fallon CK; Jefferson B
    Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():652776. PubMed ID: 34109222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial validation of the trust of automated systems test (TOAST).
    Wojton HM; Porter D; T Lane S; Bieber C; Madhavan P
    J Soc Psychol; 2020 Nov; 160(6):735-750. PubMed ID: 32297844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation.
    Pop VL; Shrewsbury A; Durso FT
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):545-56. PubMed ID: 25977317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.
    Karpinsky ND; Chancey ET; Palmer DB; Yamani Y
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():194-201. PubMed ID: 29866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.