These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30812068)
1. Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services. Mathioudakis AG; Salakari M; Pylkkanen L; Saz-Parkinson Z; Bramesfeld A; Deandrea S; Lerda D; Neamtiu L; Pardo-Hernandez H; Solà I; Alonso-Coello P Psychooncology; 2019 May; 28(5):939-947. PubMed ID: 30812068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Women's Experiences of Inaccurate Breast Cancer Screening Results: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis. Health Quality Ontario Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(16):1-22. PubMed ID: 27468327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Eliciting women’s preferences for breast cancer screening]. Sicsic J; Pelletier-Fleury N; Carretier J; Moumjid N Sante Publique; 2019; S2(HS2):7-17. PubMed ID: 32372583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Nelson HD; Pappas M; Cantor A; Griffin J; Daeges M; Humphrey L Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):256-67. PubMed ID: 26756737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's Benefits and Harms Trade-Offs in Breast Cancer Screening: Results from a Discrete-Choice Experiment. Sicsic J; Pelletier-Fleury N; Moumjid N Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 29304944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eliciting women's cervical screening preferences: a mixed methods systematic review protocol. Wood B; Van Katwyk SR; El-Khatib Z; McFaul S; Taljaard M; Wright E; Graham ID; Little J Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 5(1):136. PubMed ID: 27516072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensive follow-up for women with breast cancer: review of clinical, economic and patient's preference domains through evidence to decision framework. Lafranconi A; Pylkkänen L; Deandrea S; Bramesfeld A; Lerda D; Neamțiu L; Saz-Parkinson Z; Posso M; Rigau D; Sola I; Alonso-Coello P; Martinez-Zapata MJ Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Oct; 15(1):206. PubMed ID: 29052503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter? Vass CM; Rigby D; Payne K Value Health; 2018 Feb; 21(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 29477404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial. Hersch J; McGeechan K; Barratt A; Jansen J; Irwig L; Jacklyn G; Houssami N; Dhillon H; McCaffery K BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e016246. PubMed ID: 28988168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature. DuBenske LL; Schrager SB; Hitchcock ME; Kane AK; Little TA; McDowell HE; Burnside ES J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1805-1814. PubMed ID: 30030738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Systematic Review of Women's Knowledge of Screening Mammography. Seaman K; Dzidic PL; Castell E; Saunders C; Breen LJ Breast; 2018 Dec; 42():81-93. PubMed ID: 30199761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of information about overdetection of breast cancer on women's decision-making about mammography screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Hersch J; Barratt A; Jansen J; Houssami N; Irwig L; Jacklyn G; Dhillon H; Thornton H; McGeechan K; Howard K; McCaffery K BMJ Open; 2014 May; 4(5):e004990. PubMed ID: 24833692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perspectives on mammography after receipt of secondary screening owing to a false positive. Thomson MD; Siminoff LA Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 25648490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions. Pace LE; Keating NL JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1327-35. PubMed ID: 24691608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefits and harms of breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: A systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer. Canelo-Aybar C; Ferreira DS; Ballesteros M; Posso M; Montero N; Solà I; Saz-Parkinson Z; Lerda D; Rossi PG; Duffy SW; Follmann M; Gräwingholt A; Alonso-Coello P J Med Screen; 2021 Dec; 28(4):389-404. PubMed ID: 33632023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study. Henriksen MJ; Guassora AD; Brodersen J BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():404. PubMed ID: 26336075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of patient decision aids increased younger women's reluctance to begin screening mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ivlev I; Hickman EN; McDonagh MS; Eden KB J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jul; 32(7):803-812. PubMed ID: 28289963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. Myers ER; Moorman P; Gierisch JM; Havrilesky LJ; Grimm LJ; Ghate S; Davidson B; Mongtomery RC; Crowley MJ; McCrory DC; Kendrick A; Sanders GD JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(15):1615-34. PubMed ID: 26501537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]