These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30812068)
21. How social class shapes breast cancer risk perspectives and prevention practices of Australian midlife women: a qualitative study using the concept of 'breast cancer candidacy'. Batchelor S; Lunnay B; Macdonald S; Ward PR BMC Cancer; 2024 Oct; 24(1):1295. PubMed ID: 39428488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Women's preferences and experiences of cervical cancer screening in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Majid U; Kandasamy S; Farrah K; Vanstone M Rural Remote Health; 2019 Oct; 19(4):5190. PubMed ID: 31640391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study. He X; Schifferdecker KE; Ozanne EM; Tosteson ANA; Woloshin S; Schwartz LM J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1905-1912. PubMed ID: 30066118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Brewer NT; Salz T; Lillie SE Ann Intern Med; 2007 Apr; 146(7):502-10. PubMed ID: 17404352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Women's perceptions of personalized risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: An international focus group study. Rainey L; Jervaeus A; Donnelly LS; Evans DG; Hammarström M; Hall P; Wengström Y; Broeders MJM; van der Waal D Psychooncology; 2019 May; 28(5):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 30848018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level. Onega T; Beaber EF; Sprague BL; Barlow WE; Haas JS; Tosteson AN; D Schnall M; Armstrong K; Schapira MM; Geller B; Weaver DL; Conant EF Cancer; 2014 Oct; 120(19):2955-64. PubMed ID: 24830599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Women's perception, preconceptions, and information preferences for the limitations of breast cancer screening and overdiagnosis: a think-aloud study on the new information materials of the Agency for Health Protection of the Metropolitan Area of Milan]. De Nard F; Deandrea S; Bastiampillai AJ; Cavazzana L; Carnevali D; Principi N; Luconi E; Schulz PJ; Castaldi S; Silvestri AR Epidemiol Prev; 2021; 45(4):271-280. PubMed ID: 34549569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Women's perceptions of breast cancer screening. Spanish screening programme survey. Baena-Cañada JM; Rosado-Varela P; Expósito-Álvarez I; González-Guerrero M; Nieto-Vera J; Benítez-Rodríguez E Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):883-8. PubMed ID: 25456103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jul; 89(14):1015-26. PubMed ID: 9230883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Procedure for Eliciting Women's Preferences for Breast Cancer Screening Frequency. Grayek E; Yang Y; Fischhoff B; Schifferdecker KE; Woloshin S; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL; Tosteson ANA Med Decis Making; 2022 Aug; 42(6):783-794. PubMed ID: 35067067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Risk-Adapted Breast Screening for Women at Low Predicted Risk of Breast Cancer: An Online Discrete Choice Experiment. Kelley Jones C; Scott S; Pashayan N; Morris S; Okan Y; Waller J Med Decis Making; 2024 Jul; 44(5):586-600. PubMed ID: 38828503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study. Hersch J; Jansen J; Barratt A; Irwig L; Houssami N; Howard K; Dhillon H; McCaffery K BMJ; 2013 Jan; 346():f158. PubMed ID: 23344309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Women's Acceptance of Overdetection in Breast Cancer Screening: Can We Assess Harm-Benefit Tradeoffs? Stiggelbout A; Copp T; Jacklyn G; Jansen J; Liefers GJ; McCaffery K; Hersch J Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 31722605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Women's anxieties caused by false positives in mammography screening: a contingent valuation survey. Yasunaga H; Ide H; Imamura T; Ohe K Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jan; 101(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16821083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors Affecting Women's Participation in Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey. Luleci D; Kilic B Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 May; 23(5):1627-1634. PubMed ID: 35633547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contextual differences considered in the Tunisian ADOLOPMENT of the European guidelines on breast cancer screening. Kahale LA; Ouertatani H; Brahem AB; Grati H; Hamouda MB; Saz-Parkinson Z; Akl EA Health Res Policy Syst; 2021 May; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 33985535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dense breast tissue notification: impact on women's perceived risk, anxiety, and intentions for future breast cancer screening. Yeh VM; Schnur JB; Margolies L; Montgomery GH J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Mar; 12(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 25556313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transforming Screening Uptake in Low-resource and Underinformed Populations: A Preliminary Study of Factors Influencing Women's Decisions to Uptake Screening. Akwo JD; Erim AE; Ikamaise VC; Archibong B; Ekpo EU J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):323-330.e2. PubMed ID: 31176441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. "You probably can't feel as safe as normal women": Hispanic women's reactions to breast density notification. Pacsi-Sepulveda AL; Shelton RC; Rodriguez CB; Coq AT; Tehranifar P Cancer; 2019 Jun; 125(12):2049-2056. PubMed ID: 30768781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]