530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30813009)
1. Zirconia surface modifications for implant dentistry.
Schünemann FH; Galárraga-Vinueza ME; Magini R; Fredel M; Silva F; Souza JCM; Zhang Y; Henriques B
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 May; 98():1294-1305. PubMed ID: 30813009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic review of zirconia as an implant material.
Prithviraj DR; Deeksha S; Regish KM; Anoop N
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 23422612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Zirconia Dental Implant Surfaces on Bone Integration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hafezeqoran A; Koodaryan R
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():9246721. PubMed ID: 28299337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface modification of zirconia dental implants by laser texturing.
Cunha W; Carvalho O; Henriques B; Silva FS; Özcan M; Souza JCM
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Feb; 37(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 35022871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with 3 varying surface textures and a titanium implant: A histological and micro-CT study.
Kubasiewicz-Ross P; Hadzik J; Dominiak M
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1173-1179. PubMed ID: 29912481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is zirconia a viable alternative to titanium for oral implant? A critical review.
Sivaraman K; Chopra A; Narayan AI; Balakrishnan D
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):121-133. PubMed ID: 28827030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep.
Langhoff JD; Voelter K; Scharnweber D; Schnabelrauch M; Schlottig F; Hefti T; Kalchofner K; Nuss K; von Rechenberg B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 18977118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current status of zirconia implants in dentistry: preclinical tests.
Nishihara H; Haro Adanez M; Att W
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 30205949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Custom-made root-analogue zirconia implants: A scoping review on mechanical and biological benefits.
Pessanha-Andrade M; Sordi MB; Henriques B; Silva FS; Teughels W; Souza JCM
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2018 Nov; 106(8):2888-2900. PubMed ID: 30070423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The osseointegration of zirconia dental implants.
Assal PA
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2013; 123(7-8):644-54. PubMed ID: 23965893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants.
Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of surface-modified zirconia for the growth of bone cells and early osseointegration.
Majhi R; Majhi RK; Garhnayak L; Patro TK; Dhal A; Kumar S; Guha P; Goswami L; Goswami C
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):92.e1-92.e8. PubMed ID: 34049698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment.
Kohal RJ; Weng D; Bächle M; Strub JR
J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1262-8. PubMed ID: 15515343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs.
Schliephake H; Hefti T; Schlottig F; Gédet P; Staedt H
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Sep; 37(9):818-28. PubMed ID: 20573183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Zirconia versus titanium in dentistry: A review.
Hanawa T
Dent Mater J; 2020 Jan; 39(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 31666488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of surface topography and surface physicochemistry on wettability of zirconia (tetragonal zirconia polycrystal).
Noro A; Kaneko M; Murata I; Yoshinari M
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2013 Feb; 101(2):355-63. PubMed ID: 23165774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
