BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30813315)

  • 21. Cancer/Testis Antigens: "Smart" Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Prostate and Other Cancers.
    Kulkarni P; Uversky VN
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Mar; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 28362316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intrinsic disorder-based protein interactions and their modulators.
    Uversky VN
    Curr Pharm Des; 2013; 19(23):4191-213. PubMed ID: 23170892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Markov state models provide insights into dynamic modulation of protein function.
    Shukla D; Hernández CX; Weber JK; Pande VS
    Acc Chem Res; 2015 Feb; 48(2):414-22. PubMed ID: 25625937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deciphering the Dynamic Interaction Profile of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein by NMR Exchange Spectroscopy.
    Delaforge E; Kragelj J; Tengo L; Palencia A; Milles S; Bouvignies G; Salvi N; Blackledge M; Jensen MR
    J Am Chem Soc; 2018 Jan; 140(3):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 29276882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Probing the dynamics of disorder.
    Fox SJ; Kannan S
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2017 Sep; 128():57-62. PubMed ID: 28554553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mechanistic Insights from Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations into Mutation Induced Disordered-to-Ordered Transition in Hahellin, a βγ-Crystallin.
    Patel S; Krishnan B; Hosur RV; Chary KVR
    J Phys Chem B; 2019 Jun; 123(24):5086-5098. PubMed ID: 31136713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stromal-epithelial interactions in prostate cancer: Overexpression of PAGE4 in stromal cells inhibits the invasive ability of epithelial cells.
    Fu S; Liu T; Lv C; Fu C; Zeng R; Kakehi Y; Kulkarni P; Getzenberg RH; Zeng Y
    J Cell Biochem; 2020 Nov; 121(11):4406-4418. PubMed ID: 32003504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proteus: a random forest classifier to predict disorder-to-order transitioning binding regions in intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Basu S; Söderquist F; Wallner B
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 May; 31(5):453-466. PubMed ID: 28365882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extreme Fuzziness: Direct Interactions between Two IDPs.
    Wang W; Wang D
    Biomolecules; 2019 Feb; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 30813629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Order-disorder transition of intrinsically disordered kinase inducible transactivation domain of CREB.
    Liu H; Guo X; Han J; Luo R; Chen HF
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Jun; 148(22):225101. PubMed ID: 29907037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The IDP-Specific Force Field ff14IDPSFF Improves the Conformer Sampling of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Song D; Luo R; Chen HF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 May; 57(5):1166-1178. PubMed ID: 28448138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic conformational flexibility and molecular interactions of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Bhattarai A; Emerson IA
    J Biosci; 2020; 45():. PubMed ID: 32020911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Molecular simulations integrated with experiments for probing the interaction dynamics and binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Ghosh C; Nagpal S; Muñoz V
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2024 Feb; 84():102756. PubMed ID: 38118365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Complete Coupled Binding-Folding Pathway of the Intrinsically Disordered Transcription Factor Protein Brinker Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Markov State Modeling.
    Collins AP; Anderson PC
    Biochemistry; 2018 Jul; 57(30):4404-4420. PubMed ID: 29990433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gas-phase conformations of intrinsically disordered proteins and their complexes with ligands: Kinetically trapped states during transfer from solution to the gas phase.
    Han JY; Choi TS; Heo CE; Son MK; Kim HI
    Mass Spectrom Rev; 2019 Nov; 38(6):483-500. PubMed ID: 31021441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. AWSEM-IDP: A Coarse-Grained Force Field for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Wu H; Wolynes PG; Papoian GA
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Dec; 122(49):11115-11125. PubMed ID: 30091924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Order-Disorder Continuum: Linking Predictions of Protein Structure and Disorder through Molecular Simulation.
    Hsu CC; Buehler MJ; Tarakanova A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2068. PubMed ID: 32034199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How Do We Study the Dynamic Structure of Unstructured Proteins: A Case Study on Nopp140 as an Example of a Large, Intrinsically Disordered Protein.
    Na JH; Lee WK; Yu YG
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Jan; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 29382046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intrinsically disordered proteins and phenotypic switching: Implications in cancer.
    Kulkarni V; Kulkarni P
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2019; 166():63-84. PubMed ID: 31521237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evolutionarily conserved network properties of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Rangarajan N; Kulkarni P; Hannenhalli S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126729. PubMed ID: 25974317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.