These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30813629)

  • 61. Electrostatic interactions in molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Yang J; Zeng Y; Liu Y; Gao M; Liu S; Su Z; Huang Y
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2020 Oct; 38(16):4883-4894. PubMed ID: 31709918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Residual Structure Accelerates Binding of Intrinsically Disordered ACTR by Promoting Efficient Folding upon Encounter.
    Liu X; Chen J; Chen J
    J Mol Biol; 2019 Jan; 431(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 30528464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Gas-phase conformations of intrinsically disordered proteins and their complexes with ligands: Kinetically trapped states during transfer from solution to the gas phase.
    Han JY; Choi TS; Heo CE; Son MK; Kim HI
    Mass Spectrom Rev; 2019 Nov; 38(6):483-500. PubMed ID: 31021441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Analyzing the Folding and Binding Steps of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein by Protein Engineering.
    Bonetti D; Troilo F; Toto A; Brunori M; Longhi S; Gianni S
    Biochemistry; 2017 Jul; 56(29):3780-3786. PubMed ID: 28661120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Ensemble Calculation for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Using NMR Parameters.
    Kragelj J; Blackledge M; Jensen MR
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2015; 870():123-47. PubMed ID: 26387101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Characterization of the Binding of Small Molecules to Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Dobrev VS; Fred LM; Gerhart KP; Metallo SJ
    Methods Enzymol; 2018; 611():677-702. PubMed ID: 30471704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. IDPs in macromolecular complexes: the roles of multivalent interactions in diverse assemblies.
    Fung HYJ; Birol M; Rhoades E
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Apr; 49():36-43. PubMed ID: 29306779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Criticality in the conformational phase transition among self-similar groups in intrinsically disordered proteins: Probed by salt-bridge dynamics.
    Bandyopadhyay A; Basu S
    Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom; 2020 Oct; 1868(10):140474. PubMed ID: 32579908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Calibrated Langevin-dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Smith WW; Ho PY; O'Hern CS
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Oct; 90(4):042709. PubMed ID: 25375525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Intrinsic protein disorder uncouples affinity from binding specificity.
    Lazar T; Tantos A; Tompa P; Schad E
    Protein Sci; 2022 Nov; 31(11):e4455. PubMed ID: 36305763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. General Purpose Water Model Can Improve Atomistic Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Shabane PS; Izadi S; Onufriev AV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2620-2634. PubMed ID: 30865832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. NMR Spectroscopic Studies of the Conformational Ensembles of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Kurzbach D; Kontaxis G; Coudevylle N; Konrat R
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2015; 870():149-85. PubMed ID: 26387102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Fluorescence Depolarization Kinetics to Study the Conformational Preference, Structural Plasticity, Binding, and Assembly of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Majumdar A; Mukhopadhyay S
    Methods Enzymol; 2018; 611():347-381. PubMed ID: 30471693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. IDP-LZerD: Software for Modeling Disordered Protein Interactions.
    Christoffer C; Kihara D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2165():231-244. PubMed ID: 32621228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Dynamics of the intrinsically disordered protein NUPR1 in isolation and in its fuzzy complexes with DNA and prothymosin α.
    Neira JL; Palomino-Schätzlein M; Ricci C; Ortore MG; Rizzuti B; Iovanna JL
    Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom; 2019 Nov; 1867(11):140252. PubMed ID: 31325636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Electrostatically accelerated encounter and folding for facile recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Ganguly D; Zhang W; Chen J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(11):e1003363. PubMed ID: 24278008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Evolutionarily conserved network properties of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Rangarajan N; Kulkarni P; Hannenhalli S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126729. PubMed ID: 25974317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Structural flexibility of intrinsically disordered proteins induces stepwise target recognition.
    Shirai NC; Kikuchi M
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Dec; 139(22):225103. PubMed ID: 24329095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Quantitative biophysical characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Gibbs EB; Showalter SA
    Biochemistry; 2015 Feb; 54(6):1314-26. PubMed ID: 25631161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Co-Evolution of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins with Folded Partners Witnessed by Evolutionary Couplings.
    Pancsa R; Zsolyomi F; Tompa P
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Oct; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 30366362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.